塞尚与科学透视法的终结:梅洛-庞蒂与诺沃特尼的异同  

Cézanne and the End of Scientific Perspective:The Similarities andDifferences Between Merleau-Ponty and Novotny

作　　者：卫俊 WEI Jun(Department of Philosophy,UniversitéJean Moulin Lyon 3,Lyon 69008,France)

机构地区：[1]法国里昂第三大学哲学系,法国里昂69008

出　　处：《美育学刊》2024年第5期88-95,共8页Journal of Aesthetic Education

基　　金：教育部国家留学基金委(CSC)国家建设高水平大学公派研究生项目“梅洛-庞蒂哲学中的透视法问题:从线性透视法到视角之系统”(202006010106)的成果。

摘　　要：奥地利艺术史家诺沃特尼的塞尚研究影响了众多学者,其中包括从现象学和存在论角度阐发塞尚的法国哲学家梅洛-庞蒂。梅氏虽然援引了诺沃特尼的研究,但二者的观点实际上有很多不同。通过分析诺沃特尼对塞尚的定位,特别是所谓塞尚走了一条“中间道路”的说法,以及梅氏对诺沃特尼观点的援引和再解释,尤其是对塞尚绘画的“非人类”特征以及“色彩调节”两个问题的聚焦,结合二者对科学透视法本身的不同理解,可以看出梅氏与诺沃特尼间的相似与差异:虽然梅氏赞同诺沃特尼所说的塞尚远离科学透视法后,其绘画呈现出非人类特征,并且强调色彩调节,但他并不认为塞尚走向了再现与平面之间的中间道路,而是强调他走向了另一种知觉的真实。The Austrian art historian Novotny's research on Cézanne has influenced numerous scholars,including the French philosopher Merleau-Ponty,who elucidated Cézanne from the perspectives of phenomenology and ontology.Although Merleau-Ponty's study is inspired by Novotny's research,there are actually many differences between their views.By analyzing Novotny's positioning of Cézanne,especially the so-called“middle path”that Cézanne took,as well as Merleau-Ponty's quotation and reinterpretation of Novotny's views,especially his focus on the“non-human”features and“color modulation”of Cézanne's paintings,and with the combination of the different understandings of scientific perspectives by the two scholars,we can see the similarities and differences between Merleau-Ponty and Novotny:although Merleau-Ponty agrees with Novotny that Cézanne's paintings exhibit non-human features and emphasize color modulation after moving away from scientific perspective,he does not believe that Cézanne moves towards the middle path between representation and flatness,but rather emphasizes his move towards another kind of perceptual truth.

关 键 词：塞尚 透视法 诺沃特尼 梅洛-庞蒂 知觉 

分 类 号：B835[哲学宗教—美学] J20-02[艺术—美术]