检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张嘉军[1,2,3] 师睿智 Zhang Jiajun;Shi Ruizhi
机构地区:[1]郑州大学法学院,河南郑州450052 [2]郑州大学检察公益诉讼研究院 [3]郑州大学中国司法案例研究中心
出 处:《中州学刊》2024年第10期63-69,共7页Academic Journal of Zhongzhou
基 金:国家社会科学基金重点项目“比例原则在民事诉讼中的适用研究”(22AFX010)。
摘 要:“检察公益诉讼法”的制定已经正式列入全国人大常委会的立法规划且在有序推进,在这一背景下,我们必须要面对和解决的是,该法的调整对象为何。检察公益诉讼涉及众多单行法,其案件范围众多,这决定了确定其调整对象的复杂性和艰难性。但是,检察公益诉讼的出发点和本质为保护公益、维护公共利益,这一本质特征决定了确定其调整对象的逻辑起点,“检察公益诉讼法”的调整对象应为公益关系。在这一逻辑前提下,需要对每种公益诉讼案件类型的调整对象进行具体分析。The formulation of the“Procuratorial Public Interest Litigation Law”has been formally included in the legislative agenda of the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress of the People’s Republic of China and is progressing in an orderly man⁃ner.In this context,we must face and solve the problem of what the law is adjusted to.Procuratorial public interest litigation involves numerous separate laws and has a wide range of cases,which determines the complexity and difficulty of determining its adjustment tar⁃gets.However,the starting point and essence of prosecutorial public interest litigation is to protect public interest and safeguard public interests,which determines the logical starting point for determining its adjustment object.The adjustment object of the“Procuratorial Public Interest Litigation Law”should be public interest relationships.Under this logical premise,it is necessary to conduct a specific analysis of the adjustment targets for each type of public interest litigation case.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.239