论《春秋繁露》双重认识路线下的人性问题  

On Human Nature in Dual Cognitive Pathways in the Luxuriant Gems of The Spring and Autumn

作　　者：李逸涵 Li Yihan(School of Philosophy,Heilongjiang University,Harbin 150080)

机构地区：[1]黑龙江大学哲学学院,哈尔滨150080

出　　处：《西部学刊》2024年第20期149-152,共4页Journal of Western

摘　　要：《春秋繁露》对人性的论述存在两条不同的认识路线:一方面,其通过将性之名等同于生,进而将性描述为一种生而自备、不经后天人事的朴素资质,此为第一条以生论性的认识路线;另一方面,在《春秋繁露》中,性与善不可等同而论,其中性是善得以实现的先天基础,善是性通过教化被引导而成的后天结果,此为第二条以善论性的认识路线。两种认识路线并存导致《春秋繁露》所描述的人性理论存在性一品与性三品两种不同的思想倾向。There are two different ways of understanding human nature in Luxuriant Gems of The Spring and Autumn.On the one hand,it equates the name of nature with life,and then describes nature as a simple qualification that is inborn and self-possessed without the need for human intervention.This is the first way of understanding human nature based on life.On the other hand,in Luxuriant Gems of The Spring and Autumn,nature and goodness cannot be equated.Of the two,nature is the innate basis for the realization of goodness,whereas goodness is the acquired result of nature being guided through education.This is the second way of understanding nature based on goodness.The coexistence of two cognitive pathways leads to two different ideological tendencies in the theory of human nature described in Luxuriant Gems of The Spring and Autumn,namely,the existence of the first grade and the third grade of human nature.

关 键 词：董仲舒 《春秋繁露》 人性论 

分 类 号：B234.5[哲学宗教—中国哲学]