检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李嘉明 张树东[1] LI Jiaming;ZHANG Shudong(Faculty of Education,Beijing Normal University,Beijing,100875)
出 处:《中国特殊教育》2024年第8期10-19,51,共11页Chinese Journal of Special Education
基 金:北京市教育科学“十四五”规划2023年度重点课题“小学生识字水平测验编制及阅读障碍风险干预研究”(项目编号:CEAA23042)成果之一。
摘 要:融合教育质量评价指标的缺失在很大程度上已经成为制约我国融合教育高质量发展的阻碍。OECD于2023年10月发布《融合教育指标:分析框架》报告,以“投入—过程—结果”模型为基础,综合国际融合教育有益经验,提出构建融合教育质量评价指标体系的可行框架。通过解读该政策报告,为推进我国融合教育质量评价指标体系构建提供四方面启示:一是参考适应性、完整性、清晰性和协作性的指标制定原则;二是完善普通学校开办融合教育的前期投入指标;三是建设随班就读工作的全方位长效支持机制,四是将特殊学生的终身发展水平作为重要考量。The absence of quality assessment indicators for inclusive education has greatly hindered its high-quality development in China.In October 2023,the OECD released the report“Indicators for Inclusive Education:An Analytical Framework”.The report proposed a feasible framework for constructing a quality assessment indicator system for inclusive education based on the“Inputs-Process-Outcome”model and synthesized the useful experience of international inclusive education.This policy report offers three key insights for constructing a quality assessment indicator system for inclusive education in China:First,refer to the principles of adaptability,completeness,clarity,and collaboration in the formulation of indicators;second,improve the indicators of pre-investment in the provision inclusive education in regular schools;third,establish a comprehensive and long-term support mechanism for learning in regular classroom;fourth,focus on the lifelong development of students with special needs as an significant factor.
分 类 号:G760[文化科学—特殊教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.33