共同犯罪案件部分适用认罪认罚:问题、成因与完善——以另案处理为视角  

Partial Application of Guilty Plea in Joint Crime Cases: Issues, Causes,and Improvements from the Perspective of Separate Cases Handling

作　　者：刘昱彤 LIU Yutong(School of Criminal Justice,China University of Political Science and Law,Beijing 100088,Beijing,China)

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学刑事司法学院,北京100088

出　　处：《昆明理工大学学报（社会科学版）》2024年第5期30-39,共10页Journal of Kunming University of Science and Technology(Social Sciences)

摘　　要：我国刑事另案处理制度产生于服务办案需求之目的,具有公权力主导、阶段适用性与案件特殊性等特点。以共犯是否认罪认罚为标准作另案处理,虽利于提高诉讼效率、提升制度活力,但亦有法律依据不明、制约监督不足、被追诉人权利受限乃至未审先判之虞。究其成因,与我国“重实体、轻程序”的办案传统、动态平衡诉讼观尚未实现、“配合有余、制约不足”的公检法关系以及“案卷笔录中心主义”的裁判方式均有关联。对异化的实践样态纠偏,须在制定统一的另案处理制度体系基础上,从明晰规范标准、加强制约监督效力、落实权利保障以及明确既判力范围等方面完善,以期落实以审判为中心的诉讼体制改革目标。The separate case handling system in China s criminal justice is designed to meet the needs of case handling,characterized by the dominance of public authority,stage-specific applicability,and case specificity.Handling separate cases based on whether co-offenders plead guilty or not guilty helps improve litigation efficiency and invigorate the system.However,it also faces such problems as unclear legal basis,insufficient supervision,restricted rights of the accused,and the risk of prejudgment.The causes of these issues are linked to China s traditional ways of case handling that prioritizes substance over procedure,the unachieved dynamic balance in the view of litigation,the cooperative yet insufficiently restrictive relationship between public security,procuratorates,and courts,and the adjudication mode focused on written records.To correct the distorted practices,it is essential to establish a unified system for separate case handling,clarify and standardize procedures,strengthen supervision and effectiveness of constraints,ensure the protection of rights,and define the scope of res judicata.These measures aim to implement the trial-centered litigation system reform goals.

关 键 词：另案处理制度 共同犯罪 认罪认罚从宽 公正审判权 权利保障 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学] D924.1[政治法律—法学]