争议、平衡与展望:西方价值教育实践模式的回顾与思考  

Controversy,Balance and Prospect:Review and Reflection of Western Values Education Practice Models

作　　者：洪瑞祥 HONG Ruixiang(National Academy of Education Administration,Beijing,102617,China)

机构地区：[1]国家教育行政学院,北京102617

出　　处：《全球教育展望》2024年第9期140-148,共9页Global Education

基　　金：北京市教育科学“十四五”规划2022年度立项课题“教育戏剧:青少年文化遗产教育新模式探索”(项目编号:CICA22153)的研究成果。

摘　　要：从霍尔斯特德(Halstead)等人的观点出发,西方传统价值教育面临着学校应该向学生灌输价值观还是应该让学生探索发展自己价值观的争议,这种争议带来了以品格教育模式和价值澄清模式为代表的两种价值教育实践模式。随着时代的发展,价值教育实践逐渐在这两种争议观点中寻求平衡,以体谅模式和法理探究模式为代表的价值教育模式开始受到关注。未来的价值教育实践模式将如何发展?面对百年未有之大变局,回顾西方价值教育实践模式从争议到平衡的嬗变,可以探索时代背景下价值教育实践模式新的发展方向:从观念的实践到实践的观念、从空洞的情境到实际的情境、从已知的应对到未知的应对。From the perspective of Halstead,traditional western values education faces the controversy of whether schools should instill values into students or let them explore their own values,which has led to two practice models of values education represented by character education and values clarification.With the development of the society,seeking a balance between the two controversial views was becoming gradually a trend,the consideration model and the jurisprudential inquiry model had begun to receive attention.How about the values education practice model in the future?Combined with the review of the western values education practice model from controversy to balance,some new directions can be found:from the conceptual practice to the practical concept,from the empty situation to the actual situation,and from the known response to the unknown response.

关 键 词：价值教育 实践模式 展望 

分 类 号：G41[文化科学—教育学]