古希腊哲学中“Being”的哲学诠释  

A philosophical interpretation of"Being"in ancient Greek philosophy

作　　者：刘瑞宏 Liu Rui hong(School of Marxicm,Jiangsn Normel Umuasiog,Xuzhon Jimysu 211116)

机构地区：[1]江苏师范大学马克思主义学院,江苏徐州211116

出　　处：《理论观察》2024年第9期54-59,共6页Theoretic Observation

基　　金：江苏省社会科学基金青年项目“商谈伦理学的道德规范应用路径研究”(项目编号:23ZXC006)。

摘　　要：“Being”最初由巴门尼德提出,巴门尼德对“Bening”的思考,引向了真理之路与意见之路的对立,将“Being”译为“存在”,使得巴门尼德的‘是’的意义被湮没,是巴门尼德哲学本身的历史命运。经由柏拉图对“Being”的话语诠释,影响着理念论的发展。亚里士多德在其形而上学体系中对柏拉图理论体系的批判与进一步诠释“Being”的本体论意涵。“Being”的发展历程与本体论息息相关,而这一切也与人相关,人本身生活在现实世界中,最终回归到“Being”问题的出发点——现实生活。"Being"was first proposed by Parmenides.Parmenides'thinking of"Bening"led to the opposition between the road of truth and the road of opinion,and translated"Being"as"being",which made the meaning of Parmenides'"is"annihilated,which was the historical destiny of Parmenides'philosophy itself.Through Plato's discourse interpretation of"Being",it influences the development of idealism.Aristotle criticizes Plato's idealist system in his metaphysical system and further interprets the ontological meaning of"Being".The development process of"Being"is closely related to ontology,and all this is also related to people,who themselves live in the real world,and finally return to the starting point of"Being"-real life.

关 键 词：BEING 巴门尼德 柏拉图 亚里士多德 

分 类 号：B502[哲学宗教—外国哲学]