明何孟春“王肃代安国序”说的源流影响  

The origin and influence of He Mengchun’s“Wang Su replaced Kong Anguo in writing the preface”in the Ming Dynasty

作　　者：张懋学 万安伦 ZHANG Mao-xue;WAN An-lun

机构地区：[1]北京第二外国语学院中华文明阐释与国际传播研究院,北京朝阳100024 [2]华侨大学新闻与传播学院/北京师范大学新闻传播学院,福建厦门361021

出　　处：《华侨大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2024年第5期124-132,共9页Journal of Huaqiao University(Philosophy & Social Sciences)

基　　金：中国博士后科学基金第72批面上资助项目“六朝前孔子遗说的编纂与儒家文化的传播研究”(2022M720489)。

摘　　要：何孟春《孔子家语注》是《家语》传世本中的重要一极,书前所录《孔子家语·后序》及何氏识语是批判《家语》的重要文献。其实,何孟春本《后序》源自《文献通考》,何氏将段前领起语“王肃注后序曰”改作“魏王肃序曰”,进而怀疑王肃代替孔安国作序。因何孟春能自圆其说、何孟春本刊成较早、传播媒介众多以及顺应了当时的辨伪潮流等因素,“王肃代安国序”说广泛流行。郎瑛上承何孟春之说,改王柏《家语考》并臆测“孔衍之《序》意亦王肃自为”,后经朱彝尊、戴震等人递相转引、推演,渐失本义。He Mengchun’s notes on Kong Zi Jia Yu is an important version.The preface of Kong Zi Jia Yu and his postscript in the front of the book is an important document to criticize the preface of Jia Yu.In fact,He Mengchun’s postscript is derived from Wen Xian Tong Kao.He changed the leading words before paragraph from“Wang Su’s annotation of postscript”to“Wei Wang Su’s postscript”,and then suspecting Wang Su makes postscript instead of Kong Anguo.The popularity of He’s viewpoint is related to such factors as its self justification,its early and representative publication,and its numerous media.The most important thing is that it conforms to the trend of identifying the false in Kong Zi Jia Yu in the Ming and Qing Dynasties.He’s view was quoted and deduced from Lang Ying,Zhu Yizun and Dai Zhen,which gradually lost its original meaning.

关 键 词：《孔子家语》 何孟春 孔安国 王肃 辨伪 

分 类 号：G256[文化科学—图书馆学] B222.2[哲学宗教—中国哲学]