“实验者回归”论点有效吗?  

Is the“Experimenters'Regress”Argument Valid?

作　　者：王浩 维克托瑞·道尔可 WANG Hao;Viktoria Dalko(Research Institute of Comprehensive Economics,Quincy,MA,02171,USA;Department of Finance,Hult International Business School,Quincy,MA,02141,USA;Division of Continuing Education,Harvard University,Cambridge,MA,02141,USA)

机构地区：[1]综合经济学研究所,美国马萨诸塞州昆西市02171 [2]霍特国际商学院,美国马萨诸塞州剑桥市02141 [3]哈佛大学继续教育学院,美国马萨诸塞州剑桥市02141

出　　处：《自然辩证法通讯》2024年第10期50-57,共8页Journal of Dialectics of Nature

摘　　要：“实验者回归”通过放大实验过程的不确定性,否定实验可重复性的自然决定性,提出社会协商决定实验的客观确定性的方案。为了澄清实验可重复性能够带来客观性的科学事实,首先比较可控实验与纯粹观察及建造的异同,并且整理有效性的意义,然后逐一分析了柯林斯的“实验者回归”所依据的三个案例,最后发现:引力波探测和TEA激光器的建造都不是科学实验,超心理学尚未被接纳为科学,用这三个案例作为讨论实验可重复性的基础是无效的。从定量的科学研究上看,“实验者回归”论点完全无效。"Experimenters'Regress"amplifies the uncertainty of the experimental process,negates the natural determinacy of the repeatability of the experiment,and proposes a plan for social negotiation to determine the objective certainty of the experiment.In order to clarify that experimental repeatability can bring objectivity to the scientific fact,this article first compares the similarities and differences between controlled experiments and pure observation as well as device construction,and sorts out the meaning of the term validity,and then analyzes one by one the three cases that Collins'"Experimenters'Regress"is based on.It was found that gravitational wave detection and the construction of TEA(gas)lasers are not controlled experiments.Parapsychology has not been accepted as a scientific field.Therefore,none of the three is valid as the basis for discussing the repeatability of scientific experiments.In terms of quantitative scientific research,the"Experimenters'Regress"argument is completely invalid.

关 键 词：实验者回归 可重复性 可重现性 可复制性 有效性 

分 类 号：B841.4[哲学宗教—基础心理学] N09[哲学宗教—心理学]