“双一流”学科建设成效评价方法:从学科监测到学科分析  

Evaluation Methods of Effectiveness for“Double World-Class”Construc⁃tion:From Discipline Monitoring to Discipline Self-analysis

作　　者：梁枫[1] 王靖媛 LIANG Feng;WANG Jingyuan

机构地区：[1]上海交通大学安泰经济与管理学院,上海200030

出　　处：《高教发展与评估》2024年第6期45-51,I0004,共8页Higher Education Development and Evaluation

基　　金：上海交通大学研究生教育创新治理课题(JXYJ2023-36)。

摘　　要：“双一流”学科建设将学科监测作为其建设成效的主要评价方法,具备常态化、数据密集型等特点和优势。为进一步明确院系作为建设单位的主体责任和自主性,需要加强监测与评估的一体化,突出评价方法的问题导向和需求导向。“双一流”学科建设成效评价方法从学科监测到学科分析的优化路径是:在教育部层面改革顶层设计,在高校层面下沉资源配置,在院系层面强化组织能力。Discipline monitoring,as the primary evaluation method of effectiveness for“Double World-Class”construction,is characterized by its normalization and data-intensive nature.In order to clarify and specify the responsibility and initiative of a particular department as a construction unit,strengthen the inte⁃gration of monitoring and assessment,and highlight the problem-oriented and demand-oriented nature of the evaluation methods,this study adopts the Institutional Research theory and summarizes extensive working prac⁃tices.Then the paper posits“discipline self-analysis”as the enhancement of current evaluation methods of ef⁃fectiveness.In conclusion,as a form of self-evaluation at the department level,the discipline self-analysis de⁃mands the Ministry of Education to delegate certain authority and conduct key indicator assessments.It also re⁃quires universities to allocate the relevant resources to the department level and departments to enhance their organizational and mobilization capabilities for“Double World-Class”construction.

关 键 词：“双一流”建设 学科建设 成效评价方法 学科监测 学科分析 

分 类 号：G644[文化科学—高等教育学]