检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:闫润 余颖 张容 夏华 叶运莉 YAN Run;YU Ying;ZHANG Rong;XIA Hua;YE Yunli(School of Public Health,Southwest Medical University,Luzhou,Sichuan 646000,China;Office of Jinjiang Center for Disease Control and Prevention,Jinjiang,Fujian 362200,China)
机构地区:[1]西南医科大学公共卫生学院,四川泸州646000 [2]晋江市疾病预防控制中心办公室,福建晋江362200
出 处:《中国医学科学院学报》2024年第5期666-670,共5页Acta Academiae Medicinae Sinicae
基 金:四川省哲学社会科学重点研究基地—社会治理创新研究中心基金(SHZLZD2003);四川省科技计划项目基金(2024JDKP0045)。
摘 要:目的编制教师幼儿性教育知信行评价量表并分析其信效度,为开展教师幼儿性教育相关研究提供评价工具。方法在参考相关指南、查阅文献的基础上,结合知信行理论经研究小组讨论初步形成量表条目池,采用德尔菲专家咨询法经过2轮咨询后编制量表。2023年5月采用分层整群抽样法抽取重庆市长寿区535名幼儿教师进行调查,采用Cronbachα系数、折半信度、探索性因子分析及内容效度进行信效度评价。结果最终形成包含知识、态度、行为3个维度,27个条目的教师幼儿性教育知信行评价量表。量表的总Cronbachα系数为0.875,知识、态度、行为维度的Cronbachα系数分别为0.902、0.743、0.879;量表的总折半系数为0.937,知识、态度、行为维度的折半系数分别为0.934、0.821、0.912。量表内容效度较好,因子载荷范围0.500~0.836,累计方差贡献率为61.57。教师的性教育知信行平均分(72.85±7.13)分,良好率为70.84%。结论编制的教师幼儿性教育知信行评价量表的信效度较好,可用于评价教师的幼儿性教育知信行水平。教师的性教育知信行水平不高,有关部门需要开展针对幼儿性教育的培训。Objective To develop the knowledge,attitude,and practice evaluation scale for teachers’early childhood sex education and analyze the reliability and validity of the scale,providing evaluation tools for the research on teachers’early childhood sex education.Methods On the basis of relevant guidelines,publications,and the theory of knowledge,attitude,and practice,a preliminary pool of items for the scale was formed by group discussions.The scale was drafted after two rounds of Delphi expert consultation.In May 2023,stratified cluster sampling was conducted,and 535 preschool teachers from Changshou District,Chongqing were selected for a survey.Cronbach’sαcoefficient,split-half reliability,exploratory factor analysis,and content validity were adopted to assess the reliability and validity of the scale.Results An evaluation scale for teachers’early childhood sex education was formulated,involving 27 items in 3 dimensions of knowledge,attitude,and practice.The total Cronbach’sαcoefficient of the scale was 0.875,and that of the knowledge,attitude,and practice dimensions were 0.902,0.743,and 0.879,respectively.The total split-half reliability of the scale was 0.937,and that of the knowledge,attitude,and practice dimensions were 0.934,0.821,and 0.912,respectively.The content validity of the scale was good,with a factor loading range of 0.500-0.836 and a cumulative variance contribution rate of 61.57.The average score of teachers’knowledge,attitude,and practice in sex education was 72.85±7.13,with a good rate of 70.84%.Conclusions The developed scale for evaluating teacher’s early childhood sex education demonstrates good reliability and validity,and it can be used to evaluate the teachers’knowledge,attitude,and practice in early childhood sex education.The evaluation results indicate that teachers have low levels of knowledge,attitude,and practice in sex education,and relevant departments need to carry out training on the sex education for young children.
分 类 号:R179[医药卫生—妇幼卫生保健] G78[医药卫生—公共卫生与预防医学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49