《乐记》“人生而静”章不同解释路向的考察与反思  

An Analysis and Reflection on Different Interpretations of"Human Nature is Calmness"in"Yueji"

作　　者：成守勇 CHENG Shouyong(School of Marxism,Huaiyin Normal University,Huai'an,Jiangsu 223001)

机构地区：[1]淮阴师范学院马克思主义学院,江苏淮安223001

出　　处：《淮阴师范学院学报（哲学社会科学版）》2024年第6期560-566,647,共8页Journal of Huaiyin Teachers College(philolophy and social sciences Edition)

基　　金：2022年度国家社会科学基金“《乐记》学史与诠释研究”(22BZX043);2019年度教育部规划项目“传统礼乐之哲学义理研究”(19YJA720003);2024年度淮安市社科联课题“中华民族现代文明建设中淮安的创新实践研究”(2024SK61)。

摘　　要：《乐记》“人生而静”章蕴含着对人性、欲望与恶之间关系的思考。程朱一系重视“天理”“人欲”之说而极力推崇此段文字,在陆九渊、王船山及部分清儒那里,此节文字却颇遭诟议。通过对诸家注解文字的梳理分析与阐释剖判,反思经典文本在不同思想家那里际遇之不同,源于思想家们对经典文本的理解存在分歧、各自思想态度与关注旨趣有异、对儒家根本精神认同不一等因素。就对经典文本的理解而言,在尊重文本自身与其结构呈现的情况下,也需要注意发掘文本解释的潜力与文本结构义理的一贯性,从而使文本在保有自身一致性的情况下,也存在意蕴增长的可能性。The chapter"Human Nature is Calmness"in"Yueji"contains contemplation on the relationship between human nature,desires,and evil.The Cheng-Zhu school highly valued the concepts of"Heavenly Principle"and"Human Desires"and greatly extolled this passage,while it was criticized by Lu Jiuyuan,Wang Chuanshan,and some Qing dynasty Confucians.Through analyzing and interpreting the commentaries of various scholars,we reflect on how different thinkers have encountered this classic text differently due to divergences in their understanding of the text,differences in their intellectual attitudes and interests,and varying degrees of agreement with the fundamental spirit of Confucianism.In terms of understanding classic texts,while respecting the text itself and its structural presentation,it is also necessary to explore the potential for textual interpretation and the consistency of the text's structural principles,thereby allowing the text to maintain its coherence while also possessing a growing significance.

关 键 词：《乐记》 “人生而静” 天人 理欲 朱熹 

分 类 号：B222[哲学宗教—中国哲学]