政策工具视角下我国美育教育的价值追求与实现  

Implications and Suggestions on China’s Aesthetic Education Policy Based on the Use of Policy Tools

作　　者：曾颖 张伟清 秦宗璧[3] 彭丽春 ZENG Ying;ZHANG Weiqing;QIN Zongbi;PENG Lichun(School of Education,Chuxiong Normal University,Chuxiong,Yunnan Province 675000;School of Fine Arts,Yunnan Normal University,Kunming,Yunnan Province 650500;School of Languages and Culture,Chuxiong Normal University,Chuxiong,Yunnan Province 675000;Central Complete Primary School,Mengdong Township,Cangyuan County,Cangyuan,Yunnan Province 677400)

机构地区：[1]楚雄师范学院教育学院,云南楚雄675000 [2]云南师范大学艺术学院,云南昆明650500 [3]楚雄师范学院语言文化学院,云南楚雄675000 [4]沧源县勐董镇中心完小,云南沧源677400

出　　处：《楚雄师范学院学报》2024年第6期50-56,共7页Journal of Chuxiong Normal University

基　　金：云南省教育科学规划(高等学校教师教育联盟)教师教育专项课题“高师院校思想政治理论课的实践创新研究”(GJZ2305)。

摘　　要：美育政策对学校美育实践具有指导作用。政策工具是政策文本、目标和行动之间的连接机制。文章对1985年-2022年间美育政策及相关文献进行梳理,通过工具分类、文本界定和政策编码,遵循“政策工具——政策内容”二维矩阵分析框架,以33份美育政策文本进行分析和探究,我国美育政策工具选择存在环境型政策工具影响作用明显,供给性政策工具的推动作用不够显著,需求型政策工具拉动作用欠缺等。据此,可通过提高美育政策实施路径中的融合度,全面细化美育政策中有关法制管理与措施,优化政策工具的精准度,增强美育政策的灵活性等路径优化我国美育政策工具。The aesthetic education policy in our country plays a decisive guiding role in school aesthetic education practice.Policy tools serve as the connecting mechanism between policy texts,goals and actions,providing insights into the causes of policies,grasping patterns,and better promoting the scientific development and improvement of national aesthetic education policies.This article collects and organizes aesthetic education policy literature from 1985 to 2022,analyzing 33 aesthetic education policy texts.Following a two-dimensional matrix analysis framework of“policy tools-policy content”,the current status of aesthetic education policies in China is presented through tool classification,text delineation,and policy encoding.The research reveals that current aesthetic education policies consist of three modules:“overall objectives,main tasks,and management guarantees.”These policies exhibit relatively limited use of“supply-type”policy tools,indicating room for improvement and adjustment.The impact generated by the use of“environmental-type”tools is more pronounced,suggesting the need for refining policy implementation guidelines.The use of“demand-type”tools is noticeably insufficient,indicating a need for strategies that enhance flexibility and precision.

关 键 词：美育政策 政策工具 选择优化 

分 类 号：G40-014[文化科学—教育学原理]