普遍性、确定性的现代性“春秋公羊学”是如何可能的——从康有为的经学叙事谈起  

How Universal and Deterministic Modern “Gongyang’s Studies” on The Spring and Autumn Annals IsPossible:A Perspective of Kang Youwei’s Narrative of Classics Scholarship

作　　者：樊志辉 FAN Zhihui(School of Philosophy and Law,Shanghai Normal University,Shanghai 200234,China)

机构地区：[1]上海师范大学哲学与法政学院,上海200234

出　　处：《衡水学院学报》2024年第6期11-19,共9页Journal of Hengshui University

摘　　要：康有为的经学叙事是儒学现代转换的第一次尝试。康有为运用“春秋公羊学”的思想进路,重新诠释了中国思想传统,塑造了孔子作为改革家和教主的形象。康有为以对董仲舒思想再诠释为中介,在现代性的语境下重新建构了现代性的“春秋公羊学”。康有为经学诠释的叙事方式与内在逻辑,是考察他的现代性春秋公羊学的普遍性与确定性这一问题所必须面对的。康有为试图建立一个具有普遍性、确定性的现代性“春秋公羊学”,但由于现实与理论的双重制约,他并没有完成这一任务。康有为是一位时代转折点上的历史人物,他的思想遗产值得我们加以整理与研究。Kang Youwei’s narrative of classics scholarship is the first attempt at the modern transformation of Confucianism.He reinterpreted China’s ideological traditions and shaped the image of Confucius as a reformer and founder by using the ideological approach of“Gongyang’s studies on The Spring and Autumn Annals”.Taking the reinterpretation of Dong Zhongshu’s ideology as a medium,he reconstructed the modern“Gongyang’s studies on The Spring and Autumn Annals”in the context of modernity.The narrative style and internal logic of Kang Youwei’s interpretation of Confucian classics are essential for examining the universality and modernity of his modern Gongyang’s studies on The Spring and Autumn Annals.He attempted to establish universal and deterministic modern Gongyang’s studies on The Spring and Autumn Annals,but due to the dual constraints of reality and theory,he did not complete this task.He was a historical figure at a turning point in his era,and his ideological heritage is worth sorting out and studying.

关 键 词：董仲舒 春秋公羊学 康有为 现代性 

分 类 号：B234.5[哲学宗教—中国哲学]