性爱工具而非完美伴侣——对于性爱机器人的再思考  

Sexual tools rather than perfect partners: a reconsideration of sex robots

作　　者：徐汉辉 XU Hanhui(Fudan University,The Institute of Technology Ethics for Human Future,Associate Professor,Shanghai 200433,China)

机构地区：[1]复旦大学科技伦理与人类未来研究院,上海200433

出　　处：《中国医学伦理学》2024年第12期1429-1432,共4页Chinese Medical Ethics

基　　金：国家社科基金项目“智能养老时代下老龄护理中的伦理问题及应对策略研究”(22CZX019)。

摘　　要：在《当代医疗与儒家思想》的第十一章“性爱机器人”中,通过对三位学者文章的评述,该书作者范瑞平基于儒家视角提出了对于性爱机器人的看法,即性爱机器人无法成为也不应该被视为人类的完美伴侣。这一观点可能面临着一系列的挑战。挑战一:未来拥有逼真的人类外貌的机器人,或许能够进化到既能满足用户的性需求,又能为用户提供情绪价值,还能做家务的阶段。这种集多种功能于一身的机器人难道还算不上完美吗?挑战二:既然儒家反对将性爱机器人视为完美伴侣,那么儒家大概不会支持用户因沉溺于性爱机器人所带来的体验而不愿与真实人类建立伴侣关系。然而,问题在于该如何避免沉溺式地使用性爱机器人?挑战三:仅被当作工具的性爱机器人被用于人类伴侣间的日常使用,是否能够被儒家所接受?尝试基于儒家视角对以上挑战进行回应。In Chapter 11“sex robots”of the book Contemporary Medicine and Confucian Thought,through the review of articles by three scholars,Fan Ruiping proposed his view on sex robots from a Confucian perspective,that is,sex robots cannot and should not be regarded as perfect partners for humans.This viewpoint may face a series of challenges.Challenge one:in the future,robots with realistic human appearances may evolve to a stage where they can not only satisfy users’sexual needs but also provide emotional value and do household chores.Isn’t this kind of robot that combines multiple functions still considered perfect?Challenge two:since Confucianism opposes viewing sex robots as perfect partners,it is unlikely that Confucianism will support users who are unwilling to establish a partner relationship with real humans due to their addiction to the experience brought by sex robots.However,the question is how to avoid the addictive use of sex robots.Challenge three:can sex robots,which are only used as tools,be accepted by Confucianism for daily use between human partners?Attempt to respond to the above challenges from a Confucian perspective.

关 键 词：科技伦理 性爱机器人 儒家思想 伴侣关系 家庭和谐 

分 类 号：R-052[医药卫生]