检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨延宁[1] YANG Yanning
出 处:《英语研究》2024年第2期148-167,共20页English Studies
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目“语法隐喻视野下的汉语构式演变研究”(20BYY002)的阶段性成果。
摘 要:理科教材作为教育知识的重要载体,其语言质量与学习效率密切相关。近年来,我国理科教材的语言承受了很多批评,其中大多来自学生。与此同时,英语理科教材在学生群体中大受称道,很多学生借助其开展学习。为明确学生们的直观感受是否准确,有必要对我国理科教材语言开展客观分析。本文以汉英理科教材语篇为分析对象,对比二者差异,探究学生的批评之声从何而来。研究中使用了全新的语篇分析模式,同时借助量化手段揭示语言特征。本研究认为,我国理科教材的语言质量能够满足读者需求,但在语篇结构和语境指向上确有需要改进之处。As an important carrier of educational knowledge,the linguistic quality of science textbooks is closely related to the efficiency of learning.In recent years,the language of Chinese science textbooks has been subjected to a lot of criticism,mostly from students.At the same time,English science textbooks are very popular among students,and many of them study with the help of English textbooks.In order to justify whether the students'criticism is accurate,it is necessary to analyze the language of Chinese science textbooks.This paper analyzes the discourse of Chinese and English science textbooks,compares the differences between them,and explores where students'criticisms come from.A new model of discourse analysis is deployed in the study,and quantitative methods are used to reveal the linguistic features of textbook discourse.The study argues that the language quality of Chinese science textbooks can meet the needs of readers,but there is room for improvement in terms of discourse structure and contextualization.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:13.58.36.197