口译资格考试评分方法研究--兼及CATTI考试二十年回顾式分析  

On scoring methods of interpreting accreditation examinations:With a retrospective analysis of the CATTI test over the past 20 years

作　　者：黄敏[1] 王斌华[2] Huang Min;Wang Binhua

机构地区：[1]武汉大学外国语言文学学院 [2]英国利兹大学语言、文化、社会学院

出　　处：《西安外国语大学学报》2024年第4期103-108,共6页Journal of Xi’an International Studies University

基　　金：国家留学基金委青年骨干教师出国研修项目“翻译职业化与翻译资格考试研究”(项目编号:202106275016)的阶段性研究成果。

摘　　要：评分方法的确定是语言测试设计的关键。分析性评分法和整体评分法各具优缺点,在确定评分方法时,除需考虑欲测构念的理论界定,还需分析具体测试任务情景。尽管口译能力由多个成分构成,口译测试理论上应采用分析性评分法,但口译资格考试的任务情景不同于口译教学测试。通过分析其九大特性,并与两种评分方法的特点进行对照,本文认为,口译资格考试应当采用整体评分法。回顾式分析发现,我国的CATTI口译考试施考二十年来一直采用的是整体评分法。The determination of scoring methods is critical to the design of a language test.Analytical scoring methods and ho-listic scoring methods each have their own advantages and disadvantages.When deciding on a scoring method,it is essential to consider not only the theoretical definition of the construct to be tested but also to analyze the specific testing task context.In-terpreting competence is comprised of multiple components;therefore,theoretically,analytical scoring methods should be em-ployed in interpreting tests.However,the testing context of interpreting accreditation examinations differs from that of assess-ments in interpreting training.By analyzing its nine major characteristics and contrasting them with the strengths and weaknes-ses of the two scoring methods,we contend that interpreting accreditation examinations should adopt the holistic scoring meth-od.A retrospective analysis reveals that China's CATTI test for interpreters has employed the holistic scoring method for the past twenty years.

关 键 词：口译资格考试 全国翻译专业资格(水平)考试 评分信度 评分方法 整体评分法 

分 类 号：H059[语言文字—语言学]