论功利主义对权利局限的自我修复——以密尔为中心的考察  

On Utilitarianism's Self-improvement on the Limitations of Right:A Study Centered on John Stuart Mill

作　　者：李育书 LI Yu-shu(Shanghai University of Finance and Economics,Shanghai 200433,China)

机构地区：[1]上海财经大学,上海200433

出　　处：《云南大学学报（社会科学版）》2024年第6期40-47,共8页The Journal of Yunnan University:Social Sciences Edition

基　　金：上海财经大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目“德国古典哲学对古典政治经济学的回应及其唯物史观生成效应研究”(项目号:2023110521)的阶段性研究成果。

摘　　要：随着功利主义原则的进一步展开,它与权利的冲突变得日益明显,密尔较早关注到上述冲突并做出了重要修复,他通过关注所有相关者的利益,重申权利的重要地位,论证自由对于功利的积极意义和确立次级规则等工作,初步建立了功利与权利的相容性,密尔这一工作具有意义,其开启的方向更值得肯定。但是,以密尔为代表的功利主义的自我修复依然存在着重要局限,权利依然具有工具性特征,为此,我们需要在权利基础上,通过权利来扩展福利,推动权利与功利的正向促进,这将更为牢固也更具意义。With the further development of utilitarian principles,their conflicts with right have become increasingly apparent.John Stuart Mill paid attention to these conflicts fairly early and made important improvements.He initially established the compatibility between utility and right by focusing on the interests of all stakeholders,reaffirming the importance of right,demonstrating the positive significance of freedom for utility,and establishing secondary rules.Mill's work is meaningful and its research orientation deserves recognition.However,the self-improvement of utilitarianism represented by John Stuart Mill still has major limitations,because right still maintains instrumental characteristics.Therefore,on the basis of right we need to expand welfare through right,and promote the positive promotion of right and utility,which will be more convincing and meaningful.

关 键 词：功利主义 权利 功利 密尔 

分 类 号：B561.4[哲学宗教—外国哲学]