铜及铜合金管材生产企业2种节能量计算方法对比及分析  

Comparison and Analysis of Two Energy Saving Calculation Methods in a Copper and Copper Alloy Pipe Production Enterprise

作　　者：邹武 文震林[2,3,4] 孙李媛 谢运生[2,3,4] 吴晓方 ZOU Wu;WEN Zhenlin;SUN Linyuan;XIE Yunsheng;WU Xiaofang(Institute of Jiangxi ZhongKe Ecological Civilization Innovation Research,Nanchang 330096,China;Institute of Energy Research,Jiangxi Academy of Sciences,Nanchang 330096,China;Jiangxi Carbon Neutralization Research Center,Nanchang 330096,China;Jiangxi Carbon Neutral Technology Innovation Center,Nanchang 330096,China)

机构地区：[1]江西中科生态文明创新研究院,南昌330096 [2]江西省科学院能源研究所,南昌330096 [3]江西省碳中和研究中心,南昌330096 [4]江西省碳中和技术创新中心,南昌330096

出　　处：《能源研究与管理》2024年第4期191-196,202,共7页Energy Research and Management

基　　金：江西省科学院包干制试点示范项目重点研发计划重点项目(2022YSBG21013)。

摘　　要：为帮助企业更好地控制能源消耗,减少能源浪费并提高能源利用效率,对江西省某铜及铜合金管材生产企业开展节能量审核,采用2种节能量计算方法,并对比计算结果的差别以及企业实际专项补贴资金落实的情况。结果表明:如果企业存在多项节能技改项目,当使用整体法计算节能量数据偏大且建立的回归模型适用性不足时,采用措施法计算得到的结果更加准确,更有利于企业实际申请工业节能专项资金的落地。为今后开展同类企业的节能量审核工作提供一定的借鉴作用。To help companies better control energy consumption, reduce energy waste and improve energy efficiency, anenergy saving audit was conducted on a copper and copper alloy pipe production enterprise in Jiangxi province. Two energysaving calculation methods were used, and the differences in calculation results and the actual implementation of specialsubsidy funds by the enterprise were compared. The results indicate that if a company has multiple energy-saving technologicalrenovation projects, when using the overall method to calculate energy-saving data is too large and the establishedregression model is not applicable, the results obtained by using the measure method are more accurate and more conduciveto the actual application of industrial energy-saving special funds by the company. This provides a certain reference for future energy-saving audits of similar enterprises.

关 键 词：节能量 措施法 整体法 归一化 

分 类 号：TK018[动力工程及工程热物理] F273[经济管理—企业管理]