李渔传奇六种序评者再考辨  

Further research on the preface reviewers of Li Yu's six legendary dramas

作  者:黄强[1] HUANG Qiang(School of Liberal Arts,Yangzhou University,Yangzhou 225002,China)

机构地区:[1]扬州大学文学院,江苏扬州225002

出  处:《镇江高专学报》2025年第1期11-17,28,共8页Journal of Zhenjiang College

摘  要:虞巍在顺治四年(1647年)与顺治五年(1648年)期间作序的《怜香伴》,可能只是未完成的稿本;《风筝误》的评者“朴斋主人”就是序者虞镂;《蜃中楼》首条评语是评者垒庵居士即为序者孙治的确证;李渔评鉴的传奇《香草吟》,作者不是徐士俊,而是徐冶公;《巧团圆》评点者之一“莫愁钓客”不是李渔的小友王概,李渔不可能让莫愁钓客、睡乡祭酒分别再署另一别号,合评此剧下卷;《慎鸾交》引述笠翁的两条评语证实:直至李渔晚年,其传奇十种依然以《传奇前四种》《传奇后四种》《传奇内二种》等3部单行本的形式流传,终其一生,李渔没有汇编过翼圣堂本《笠翁传奇十种》。During the fourth year(1647)and the fifth year(1648)of Shunzhi reign,The Fragrant Companion with Yu Wei s preface may still be just an unfinished manuscript.The reviewer of The Misunderstandings Caused by Kites,“master of simple building”,is the preface writer named Yu Lou.The first comment in The Mirage is a conclusive evidence that the reviewer,layman Buddhist of Lei An,is the preface writer,Sun Zhi.The legendary drama Elegy on Vanilla reviewed by Li Yu was not written by Xu Shijun,but by Xu Yegong.One of the reviewers of The Coincidental Reunion,“Mochou Angler”,is not Li Yu's friend Wang Gai.Li Yu couldn t intentionally have Mochou Angler and Shuixiang Libationer respectively sign another nickname to jointly review the second volume of this drama.Two reviews quoted in Shen Luan Jiao by Li Yu,nicknamed Bamboo-hat Man confirmed that until the later years of Li Yu's life,the ten legendary dramas have been passed down by the form of three seperate editions,including The First Four Legends,The Last Four Legends and The Middle Two Legends.Throughout Li Yu's life,he never compiled a version of Yi Sheng Tang of Ten Types of Legends of Bamboo-hat Man.

关 键 词:李渔 传奇 戏剧作品 《笠翁十种曲》 序评者 

分 类 号:I207.41[文学—中国文学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象