循证视角下我国孤独症儿童教学研究的质量分析与展望  

Quality Analysis and Prospects of Teaching Research on Children with Autism in China under Evidence-Based Perspective

作　　者：刘红梅 户秀美 孟怡菲 胡晓毅[1] LIU Hongmei;HU Xiumei;MENG Yifei;HU Xiaoyi(Autism Spectrum Disorder Education Research Center,Faculty of Education,Beijing Normal University,Beijing,100875)

机构地区：[1]北京师范大学教育学部孤独症儿童教育研究中心,北京100875

出　　处：《中国特殊教育》2024年第11期69-77,共9页Chinese Journal of Special Education

摘　　要：本文基于循证实践视角,筛选了我国2017年至2023年孤独症儿童教学研究112篇,包括77篇单一被试研究和35篇组群研究,并根据2022年发布的国际通用《研究程序和标准手册(第五版)》对我国孤独症儿童教学研究的质量进行评估。结果显示,文献整体质量逐年提升,超过一半文献符合或部分符合标准,单一被试研究中数据呈现形式规范、混淆因素控制严格,但实验设计严谨性有待加强;组群研究中各组随机分配、被试组成稳定,组间基线差异仍然显著。未来研究者应遵循循证实践的程序和标准,在检验研究数据、规范实验设计、扩展研究路线以及提高社会效度方面继续努力,以推动我国孤独症儿童教学研究的高质量发展。Based on the perspective of evidence-based practice,this study screened 112 teaching studies on children with autism spectrum disorder(ASD)in China from 2017 to 2023,including 77 single-subject studies and 35 cohort studies.The quality of these studies was evaluated according to the internationally recognized Research Procedures and Standards Manual(Fifth Edition)published in 2022.The results show that the overall quality of the literature has improved year by year,with more than half of the articles meeting or partially meeting the standards.In single-subject studies,the data presentation was standardized,confounding factors were strictly controlled,but the rigor of experimental design needs further enhancement.In the cohort studies,random allocation of groups and stability of participant composition were observed,although significant baseline differences between groups remain.Future researchers should continue to adhere to evidence-based practice procedures and standards,with efforts focused on validating research data,standardizing experimental design,expanding research pathways,and improving social validity,so as to promote the high-quality development of ASD teaching research in China.

关 键 词：循证实践 单一被试研究 孤独症儿童教学研究 组群研究 

分 类 号：G760[文化科学—特殊教育学]