从日常思维到非日常思维:刑事多元证据分析方法的新展开  

From Daily Thinking to Non-daily Thinking:The New Spread of Multi-evidence Analysis in Criminal Practice

作　　者：张迪[1] Zhang Di

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学中国法治战略研究院

出　　处：《南大法学》2025年第1期116-134,共19页NanJing University Law Journal

基　　金：2023年度国家资助博士后研究人员计划(C档)“网络犯罪数额证明的解构与重构研究”(GZC20230825)的阶段性研究成果。

摘　　要：准确认定事实之目标的实现需要借助多元化的证据分析方法,但印证方法在实践中的主导地位日益稳固。既有的分析框架无法充分解释印证方法备受实践青睐的原因。日常生活批判理论中日常思维与非日常思维的划分可以为此现象提供全新的分析视角:印证方法本质上属于日常思维,具有重复性、自发性和实用性,这就导致印证方法的同质化及封闭化运用,其他新型证据分析方法因此难以被实践所接受。故事方法、概率方法和论证方法具有自觉性、批判性、创造性等非日常性的特征,分别代表了证据分析方法精炼化、精确化和精细化的发展方向,能够满足以审判为中心制度改革的内在需求。实践中的证据分析应在思维上逐步实现非日常化。这需要明确刑事司法实践中多元证据分析方法的应用方略,再通过技术化处理、内生式发展以及灌输式教育等方式,推进其在实践中展开。The realization of the goal of accurate identification of facts requires the use of diversified methods of evidence analysis,however,the dominant position of verification method in judicial practice is becoming more and more stable.The existing analytical framework can not fully explain the reasons why the verification method is favored by the judiciary.The division of daily thinking and non-daily thinking in the theory of daily life criticism can provide a new angle of view for this phenomenon.Vertification method is daily thinking,which is repetitive,spontaneous and practical,which leads to the homogeneous and closed use of verification methods,while other new evidence analysis methods are rejected by the judiciary.The methods of story,probability and demonstration,which are characterized by self-awareness,reflection and creativity,respectively represent the refining,precision and refinement of evidence analysis methods,can satisfy the inherent demand of the trial-centered system reform.The method of evidence analysis in practice should be non-routine in thinking.The multi-evidence analysis method can be developed in practice by means of technical treatment,endogenous development and inculcation education.

关 键 词：刑事证明 印证 证据分析 故事方法 日常思维 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]