《剑桥中国上古史》内外的中国古史史料之争  

The Debate over the Historical Sources of Ancient Chinese History within and without The Cambridge History of Ancient China

作　　者：张淑一[1] Zhang Shuyi

机构地区：[1]华南师范大学历史文化学院,广州510631

出　　处：《中国社会科学评价》2024年第4期91-100,157,共11页China Social Science Review

摘　　要：《剑桥中国上古史》有关中国古史史料的看法引起中西学术界颇多争论,争论表面上是关于古史史料证史能力的分歧,深层内涵则是是否承认中国传统古史系统。争论涉及学理与文化立场两个层面,学理层面包括如何看待史料考辨、采用何种方法进行史料考辨、何谓上古“中国”等问题,相关分歧可通过学理渠道的证明阐释解决;文化立场层面则需辨清西方中心主义思想下欧美汉学界某些狭隘的意识形态,以及由此造成的学术研究上的偏颇,客观理性地平视西方的研究结论。在新形势背景下,中国学术界以从中国实际出发,提出中国方案、建立中国自主知识体系进行应对。The views on the historical sources of ancient Chinese history presented in The Cambridge History of Ancient China have sparked debates among both Chinese and Western scholars.On the surface,the debate concerns disagreements over the ability of ancient historical sources to validate history;at a deeper level,it addresses the question of whether the traditional Chinese ancient historical system should be recognized or not.The theoretical level encompasses how to approach the investigation of historical materials,the investigation methods used,and the definition of “ancient China,” among other issues.These differences can be resolved through the theoretical path of proof and interpretation.On the cultural level,it is necessary to identify and critique certain narrow ideologies within the Western-centered Sinology community in Europe and the United States,the biases in academic research they produce,and objectively and rationally assess the conclusions of Western research.

关 键 词：《剑桥中国上古史》 古史史料 学理 文化立场 自主知识体系 

分 类 号：G63[文化科学—教育学]