“小大之辩”的另一种解释向度——无小无大  

Another Dimension of Interpretation of the “Small and Big Debate”——“No Small and No Big”

作　　者：王满学 毕明良[1] Wang Manxu;Bi Mingliang

机构地区：[1]西藏民族大学,陕西咸阳712000

出　　处：《现代交际》2022年第12期90-98,123-124,共11页Modern Communication

摘　　要：历代诠释“小大之辩”基本上有三种方向,小大同扬、小大同抑和扬大抑小。这三种解释往往未结合《齐物论》中庄子关于“辩”的思考。“小大之辩”不是对“小”与“大”的肯定或否定,而是将“小”与“大”从人的主观层面排除,得到客观“道”的视角。执着于“小大之辩”的生存境域是未达“逍遥”,“逍遥”是无小无大的“道”的生存境域。In the past dynasties, there are basically three directions in the interpretation of debate between “small and big”: the small and the big are both promoted;the small and the big are both suppressed;the big are promoted and the small are suppressed. These three explanations are often not combined with Zhuangzi’s thinking on “debate” in the“Qiwu Lun”. The “small and big debate” is not an affirmation or denial of “small” and “big”, but excludes “small”and “big” from the subjective level of people, and obtains an objective “Tao” perspective. The living realm that is obsessed with “the distinction between the small and the big” is not reaching the state of “carefree”.

关 键 词：逍遥 小大之辩 庄子 

分 类 号：B223.5[哲学宗教—中国哲学]