异化批判:老子与马克思的范式差异  

Critique of Alienation:Paradigm Differences Between Laozi and Marx

作　　者：靳欢欢 左亚文[1] Jin Huanhuan;Zuo Yawen

机构地区：[1]武汉大学,湖北武汉430072

出　　处：《现代交际》2022年第11期99-106,124,共9页Modern Communication

摘　　要：老子以“道”为最高原则,认为异化即人对“道”的至高性的反叛,因而老子将异化批判集中于人性异化上,认为只有从国家和个人层面展开“无为而为”才能根除这一异化。马克思以唯物史观为基点,把对异化的剖析与批判建立在社会历史的基本运动规律上,以劳动异化为批判核心,并指出唯有在共产主义运动中推翻现存的社会关系,才能使人进入自由和解放之家园。Laozi takes Tao as the supreme principle and considers alienation to be man’s rebellion against the supremacy of Tao. Thus Laozi focuses his criticism of alienation on humanity alienation, arguing that only by “inaction”at the state and individual levels can this alienation be eradicated. The only way to eradicate this alienation is to start“inaction” at the state and individual levels. Marx, with his materialist view of history as his base, basing his analysis and critique of alienation on the basic laws of movement of social history, with the alienation of labour as the core of his critique, pointed out that only by overthrowing the existing social relations in the communist movement could man enter the home of freedom and liberation.

关 键 词：老子 马克思 异化 道 劳动 

分 类 号：A81[哲学宗教—马克思主义哲学] B223.1