检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨明佳[1] 何汶玲 Yang Mingjia;He Wenling
机构地区:[1]武汉理工大学,湖北武汉443000
出 处:《现代交际》2024年第8期39-47,122,共10页Modern Communication
摘 要:“德性”作为政治思想史中一个重要概念,一直是人类政治发展中的重要议题。与柏拉图的德性观有所不同,亚里士多德试图以独到的视角更加柔和、细致地诠释德性。在城邦层面中,亚里士多德虽然同样追求完美城邦,但他拒绝柏拉图的乌托邦式的城邦设想以及“哲学王”治国的方案,认为优良城邦之根基在于正义之人和优良公民,并认为应将中庸原则贯彻于城邦的政体选择和公民培养中。As an important concept in the history of political thought,“virtue”has always been an important topic in the development of human politics.Different from Plato’s view of virtue,Aristotle interpreted virtue more gently and meticulously from the principle of moderation.At the level of the city-state,although Aristotle also pursued the perfect city-state,he rejected the Platonic utopian idea of the city-state and the“philosopher-king”plan of governing the state,and believed that the foundation of a good city-state lies in righteous people and good citizens,and believed that the principle of moderation was implemented in the choice of government and the cultivation of citizens in the city-state.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28