20世纪以来的船山学研究钩沉——以船山学研究中的“二律背反”现象为中心  

Research on Chuanshan Studies Since the 20th Century--Centered around the Phenomenon of Antinomy in the Study of Chuanshan Studies

作　　者：高贵朋 Gao Guipeng

机构地区：[1]西安财经大学马克思主义学院

出　　处：《理论界》2025年第1期47-54,共8页Theory Horizon

基　　金：国家社科基金一般项目“儒释道融合视域下晁迥哲学思想与文献整理研究”(22BZX053)的研究成果。

摘　　要：20世纪以来的船山学研究,围绕“唯物与唯心”“理学与反理学”“超越论与实在论”等问题,呈现一种“二律背反”的现象。这种现象一方面体现了船山哲学的复杂性,船山身处明清易鼎之际,新旧学术范式的转换使得研究和定位船山哲学成为一项比较困难的工作;另一方面体现了诠释者的不同立场,他们或侧重于儒家价值,或侧重于义理思辨,从而导致不同的结论。新时代的船山学研究需要克服时代前见的影响,正视船山哲学中理的意义,重视船山哲学的发展历程,客观评价船山的历史地位。Since the 20th century,the study of Chuanshan has revealed an an-tinomy around issues such as"materialism and idealism","Neo-Confucianism and anti-Neo-Confucianism",and"transcendentalism and realism".On the one hand,this phenomenon underscores the complexity of Chuanshan's philoso-phy.Situated during the transition between the Ming and Qing dynasties,and the shift between new and old academie paradigms rendered study and interpretation of Chuanshan's philosophy particularly challenging.On the other hand,it highlights the diverse perspectives of scholars,some of whom empha-size Confucian values while others prioritize theoretical speeulation,resulting in varied interpretations.To advance Chuanshan studies in the contemporary era,it is essential to transcend the influences of past eras,acknowledge the signif-icance of Li in Chuanshan's philosophy,consider the developmental trajectory of his thought,and provide an objective assessment of his historical standing.

关 键 词：船山学 二律背反 理 气 

分 类 号：B2[哲学宗教—中国哲学]