德里达与中国文字学及中国哲学  

Derrida and Chinese Literature and Chinese Philosophy

作　　者：邓晓芒[1] Deng Xiaomang

机构地区：[1]华中科技大学哲学学院

出　　处：《世界哲学》2025年第1期132-146,F0003,共16页World Philosophy

摘　　要：德里达认为中国没有“哲学”,其文字是“非哲学的”,正好可以用来批判西方逻各斯中心主义的哲学霸权。他从中文中分析出来的主导因素是象形或“痕迹”,它超越语音特权而集中展示了语言的本质结构即不断地“替补”和“延异”,由此而保持了语言的创造性活力而不被“本体论”的形而上学所固化和僵化。但德里达未料到,中文这种非本体论的文字也有自己的形而上学,即“伦理学之后”。这种无知导致德里达堵塞了打通中西形而上学而进入到更高的形而上学即“语言学之后”的通道。Derrida argues that China has no"philosophy"and that its writing is"non-philosophical",which can be used to criticize the philosophical hegemony of Western logocentrism.The dominant element he analyzes in Chinese is the hieroglyphic or"trace",which transcends phonological prerogatives and focuses on the essential structure of the language as the constant suppleer and diferance,this,in turn,preserves the creative vitality of the language,preventing it from being solidified and ossified by the metaphysics of"ontology".However,Derrida did not realize that the Chinese language,which is not ontological,also has its own metaphysics,that is,"after ethics".This ignorance led Derrida to block the passage from Chinese and Western metaphysics to a higher metaphysics,namely,"after linguistics".

关 键 词：语音特权 痕迹 替补 原始文字 本体论 

分 类 号：B565.586[哲学宗教—外国哲学]