《墨经》与惠施“历物十事”  

The Mohist Canon and Huishi’s“Ten Propositions of Matters”

作　　者：田宝祥 Tian Baoxiang

机构地区：[1]兰州大学哲学社会学院,甘肃兰州730000

出　　处：《文史哲》2025年第1期127-134,168,共9页Literature,History,and Philosophy

基　　金：国家社科基金项目“战国中后期名辩思潮研究”(22CZX028)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：学界以往研究惠施名辩之学多从“庄惠之辩”的维度出发,然而思想史视域之比较研究显示,作为战国中期名家代表、名辩思潮核心人物的惠施,其“历物十事”与名辩学说受到《墨经》的影响更大。换而言之,《墨经》乃是惠施名辩之学的主要来源。一方面,惠施“历物十事”所论“同异”“大小”“高低”以及“有穷”“无穷”等名辩概念、逻辑命题是对《墨经》与后期墨家的回应或反驳;另一方面,惠施参与百家争鸣、开展学术论辩的理论方法亦系受《墨经》与后期墨家之启发而形成。较之“庄惠之辩”的诠释进路,将惠施名辩之学纳入《墨经》与名辩思潮的论域,对于明晰先秦论辩术、逻辑学的思想面貌与发展脉络可谓更有助益。Previous studies of Hushi’s logical method and polemics mainly focus on his debate with Zhuangzi.Yet through comparative research in a perspective of intellectual history,it can be seen that Huishi’s theory received more influence from the Mohist Cannon.On the one hand,the concepts and themes discussed in his“ten propositions of matters”such as similarities and differences,sizes,heights,existence,and infinity,were responses or refutations to the Mohist Canon and later Mohist schools.On the other hand,his theoretical methods were also inspired by the Mohist Canon and later Mohism.Compared with the research approach concerning“debate between Zhuangzi and Huishi”,taking the Mohist Cannon into consideration will be more beneficial for clarifying the outlook and evolution of Chinese logical method and polemics in the pre-Qin times.

关 键 词：《墨经》 惠施 历物十事 后期墨家 名辩思潮 

分 类 号：B81[哲学宗教—逻辑学]