《文心雕龙·体性》与柯勒律治天才论的比较  

A Comparison between“Wen Xin Diao Long:Ti Xing”and Coleridge’s Theory of Genius

作　　者：杨洁荣 Yang Jierong(School of Literature,China West Normal University)

机构地区：[1]西华师范大学文学院

出　　处：《世界文学评论(高教版)》2024年第3期181-184,共4页The World Literature Criticism

摘　　要：《文心雕龙·体性》篇论及文章风格与作者才能的关系问题,刘勰以为作者的才气体现了文章的具体风格。《体性》一篇所体现出的核心观点与柯勒律治的文论思想也有一定的相通之处。柯勒律治的文学理论观点也肯定了作者的主体地位,其中他的天才论论述了作者的才能和想象力对于诗歌的重要性,也体现了风格与作者才能的关系,这与刘勰的《体性》篇不谋而合。现将《体性》与柯勒律治的诗论进行比较,探索中西方文论的相通相异之处,以求将中国古代文论的精华流传下去。The article“Wen Xin Diao Long:Ti Xing”discusses the relationship between the style of the article and the author’s talent.Liu Xie believes that the author’s talent reflects the specific style of the article.The core viewpoint reflected in“Ti Xing”also shares some similarities with Coleridge’s literary theory.Coleridge’s literary theory also affirms the author’s subjectivity,among which his theory of genius discusses the importance of the author’s talent and imagination in poetry,and also reflects the relationship between style and author’s talent,which coincides with Liu Xie’s“Ti Xing”.This paper compares“Ti xing”with Coleridge’s poetics,and explores the similarities and differences between Chinese and Western literary theories in order to pass on the essence of ancient Chinese literary theories.

关 键 词：《文心雕龙·体性》 柯勒律治 天才论 文明异质性 天人观念 

分 类 号：I0-03[文学—文学理论]