生殖医学研究生入实验室前科研培训效果的评估  

Evaluation on the effect of scientific research training for postgraduates of reproductive medicine before entering the laboratory

作　　者：龙晓宇[1,2,3,4] 乔杰 朱小辉[1,2,3,4] LONG Xiaoyu;QIAO Jie;ZHU Xiaohui(State Key Laboratory of Female Fertility Promotion,Center for Reproductive Medicine,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology,Peking University Third Hospital,Beijing 100191,China;National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology,Beijing 100191,China;Key Laboratory of Assisted Reproduction(Peking University),Ministry of Education,Beijing 100191,China;Beijing Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology and Assisted Reproductive Technology,Beijing 100191,China)

机构地区：[1]北京大学第三医院妇产科/生殖医学中心/女性生育力促进全国重点实验室,北京100191 [2]国家妇产疾病临床医学研究中心,北京100191 [3]辅助生殖教育部重点实验室(北京大学),北京100191 [4]生殖内分泌与辅助生殖技术北京市重点实验室,北京100191

出　　处：《医学新知》2025年第2期238-244,共7页New Medicine

基　　金：中国学位与研究生教育学会医药科工作委员会医药学研究生课程建设类项目(YXC2022-01-01)。

摘　　要：目的了解北京大学第三医院生殖医学中心辅助生殖教育部重点实验室研究生和博士后对入实验室前科研培训的认识与需求,为提升生殖医学专业研究生和博士后科研能力提供建议。方法采用“问卷星”小程序对2019年至2021年期间参加过入室培训的研究生和博士后进行匿名线上问卷调查,问卷内容涵盖培训认知、需求、效果评价及改进建议等。结果共55名学生参与调查,其中博士后17名(30.91%)、博士25名(45.45%)、八年制和硕士研究生13名(23.64%),21.82%的学生从未接触过科研工作,78.18%的学生有一定科研经历。所有的学生对培训安排表示满意,但有40.00%的学生希望延长授课时间、60.00%希望增加授课内容、23.64%希望增加网络授课、21.82%希望增加生殖临床实习等。培训效果方面,科研型、有科研经历的学生在科研能力、科研思维提升和对课程满意度评分上高于临床型、无科研经历的学生;八年制学生和博士后在科研思维、实际应用和对课程满意度评分上高于硕士和博士研究生,但差异均未达到统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论入室培训对生殖医学专业研究生和博士后能力提升有积极作用,但培训机制仍需改进。后期应优化培训内容和方式,增加实践操作机会,加强师生互动和反馈机制,提高培训针对性和实效性,同时完善培训效果客观评价体系,注重培养创新思维和科研能力,为培养高精尖生殖医学人才提供支持。Objective To understand the perceptions and needs of graduate students and postdoctoral researchers at the Key Laboratory of Assisted Reproductive of Peking University Third Hospital(PUTH)regarding pre-laboratory scientific research training,and to provide suggestions for enhancing the research capabilities of graduate students and postdoctoral researchers in reproductive medicine.Methods An anonymous questionnaire survey was employed,with content covering cognitive understanding of training,specific needs,effectiveness evaluations,and suggestions for improvement.Results A total of 55 students participated in the survey,including 17 postdoctoral fellows(30.91%),25 doctoral fellows(45.45%),and 13 eight-year students and master's degree students(23.64%).21.82%of the students had never been involved in scientific research work,while 78.18%had some research experience.All students expressed satisfaction with the training arrangement,but 40.00%of students hoped to extend the teaching time,60.00%hoped to increase the teaching content,23.64%hoped to increase online teaching,and 21.82%hoped to increase reproductive clinical internships.In terms of training effectiveness,research-oriented and research-experienced students had higher ratings of research ability,improvement of research thinking and course satisfaction than clinical-oriented and non-research-experienced students.Eight-year students and postdoctoral fellows had higher ratings of research thinking,practical application and satisfaction with the course than master's and doctoral fellows,but there were no significant differences(P>0.05).Conclusion Pre-laboratory scientific research training has a positive impact on enhancing the abilities of graduate students and postdoctoral researchers in reproductive medicine.However,improvements are needed in the training mechanism.Efforts should be made to optimize training content and methods,increase opportunities for practical operations,strengthen teacher-student interaction and feedback mechanisms,and improve the relev

关 键 词：生殖医学 医学研究生 科研培训 实验室 问卷调查 

分 类 号：R-33[医药卫生] G643[文化科学—高等教育学]