检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵晓耕[1] Zhao Xiaogeng
机构地区:[1]中国人民大学法学院
出 处:《中国应用法学》2025年第1期14-26,共13页China Journal of Applied Jurisprudence
摘 要:判词作为中国古代的“裁判文书”,是是非曲直判断与评价结果的文字体现,也是为官从政者的标配。传统判词文体经历了从骈判、拟判向散判、实判的转变,而文风则从辞藻华丽转向通俗平实,但背后对情法允协的追求始终贯穿其中,反映了时人对天理、国法、人情关系的思考。针对不同类型的案件,传统判词呈现释法与说理的不同侧重,其最终目标则落脚于教化之上。传统判词作为中华优秀传统法律文化的重要组成部分,可为当前裁判文书改革提供有益借鉴。As the"judicial judgments"in ancient China,judicial judgments are the written manifestation of the judgment and evaluation results regarding right and wrong.They are also a necessary attribute for officials in their political careers.The traditional style of judicial judgments has undergone a transformation from parallel prose judgments and simulated judgments to prose judgments and practical judgments.In terms of writing style,it has shifted from being ornate in diction to being plain and straightforward.However,the pursuit of the harmonious balance between sentiment and law has always been a constant thread throughout this evolution,reflecting the reflections of people in those times on the relationship among the principles of nature,national laws,and human feelings.For different types of cases,traditional judicial judgments show different emphases on the interpretation of laws and the presentation of reasoning,with their ultimate goal lying in moral education.As an important part of the excellent traditional Chinese legal culture,traditional judicial judgments can provide useful references for the current reform of judicial documents.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49