自洗钱入罪后三个审判思路的重新审视  

Revisiting Three Judicial Pathways since the Criminalization of Self-money Laundering

作　　者：任素贤 Ren Suxian

机构地区：[1]东南大学法学院

出　　处：《中国应用法学》2025年第1期99-110,共12页China Journal of Applied Jurisprudence

摘　　要：自洗钱从“不入刑”转变为“入刑”后,司法适用中产生了诸多分歧意见。通过对303份刑事判决书的研究分析,对自洗钱的行为类型化提炼,提出可以对事后不可罚行为做精细化区分,重新审视其内部构造;基于上游犯罪完成形态复杂,上下游犯罪界限模糊,需重新审视上下游犯罪的时空界限;自洗钱行为证明构造日趋复杂,需重新审视“事前通谋”“事中共谋”的共同犯罪认定理路。在第三方参与的“事前通谋”“事中共谋”仅限于洗钱行为的情形下,应着眼于洗钱行为与上游犯罪行为之间的作用力,审视对上游行为是否存在明显的“加功”。Since self-money laundering has been transformed from“non-punishable”to“punishable”,many divergent views have arisen in its judicial application.Through the research and analysis of 303 criminal judgments,the typology of self-money laundering behavior has been refined,and it is proposed that it is possible to make a fine distinction between non-punishable after-the-fact behaviors and re-examine its internal structure;based on the complexity of upstream crime completion forms and the blurring of the boundaries between upstream and downstream crimes,the temporal and spatial boundaries between upstream and downstream crimes need to be re-examined;and as the proof of self-money laundering behavior has become more and more complex,the“prior conspiracy”and“conspiracy in the matter”of the joint criminal identification rationale.In the third party involved in the“prior conspiracy”and“in the event of conspiracy”limited to money-laundering behavior,the force between money-laundering behavior and upstream criminal behavior should be focused,and whether the upstream behavior has“strengthening effect”should be examined.

关 键 词：洗钱罪 自洗钱 行为类型 事后行为 共同犯罪 

分 类 号：D924.3[政治法律—刑法学]