检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈兵[1,2,3] 刘永集 CHEN Bing;LIU Yongji
机构地区:[1]南开大学竞争法研究中心 [2]南开大学法学院,天津300350 [3]南开大学数字经济交叉科学中心,天津300350
出 处:《学习与实践》2025年第2期45-52,共8页Study and Practice
基 金:2023年度最高人民法院司法研究重大课题“数据权益知识产权司法保护问题研究”(项目编号:ZGFYZDKT202317-03);教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目“全球数据竞争中人权基准的考量与促进研究”(项目编号:19JJD820009)。
摘 要:统筹安全与创新,是以人工智能为依托的自动驾驶发展所面临的极具挑战的价值难题。自动驾驶发展的伦理边界如何在法治层面予以回应,映射出科技伦理与法治价值的博弈与融合的现实需求。从规范性维度理解,将人工智能定位于辅助人类作出决定的工具时,其辅助属性决定了运用该技术的主体有最终决定权。当下,亟需明确法治对自动驾驶具体主体的责任设定及其归因条件,其出发点和落脚点应体现高质量发展与高水平安全的统筹,夯实自动驾驶技术开发与创新应用的安全底线,在保障安全的前提下以更加开放包容的态度促进人工智能创新发展。Coordinating safety and innovation is highly challenging value issues faced by the development of autonomous driving based on artificial intelligence.How the ethical boundaries of the application of technology can be delineated in terms of the rule of law,which is also a realistic need for the game and integration of the ethics of science and technology with the values of the rule of law.When artificial intelligence is positioned as a tool to assist human beings in making decisions,its auxiliary attributes determine that the subject who uses the technology has the final decision.At present,it is urgently need to clarify the rule of law on the application of automatic driving under the responsibility of the specific subject of the setting and attribution conditions.Its starting point and foothold should reflect the overall planning of high-quality development and highlevel safety,consolidate the safety bottom line of automatic driving technology development and innovative application,and promote the innovation and development of artificial intelligence with a more open and inclusive attitude on the premise of ensuring safety.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.190.207.221