古希腊反讽概念探微  

An Exploration of the Concept of Irony in Ancient Greece

作　　者：刘芳 Liu Fang(Hunan Academy of Social Sciences)

机构地区：[1]湖南省社会科学院(湖南省人民政府发展研究中心)

出　　处：《美学与艺术评论》2024年第2期75-86,253,254,共14页Journal of Aesthetics and Art Review

摘　　要：古希腊反讽有三种不同的面相:在阿里斯托芬谐剧《云》中苏格拉底被描述为智者,斯特瑞普西阿得斯是真正意义上苏格拉底的化身,戏剧中化名、化身与本人反转、镜像的关系,揭示了智者的思想与苏格拉底哲学思想之间的异同;柏拉图《会饮篇》描述了苏格拉底、阿伽通、阿尔及弼亚德等人关于“爱欲(伦理)”的讨论,苏格拉底克制的哲人形象彰显了理性的光辉,与此同时,这篇对话也是“爱神(Eros)”的颂词;苏格拉底申辩作为当时社会的公共事件,反映了古希腊雅典各方势力、不同阶层之间的矛盾,《申辩》属于柏拉图的早期作品,柏拉图的阐释促进了雅典政治体制、法律制度和哲学思想的转型。There are three different forms of irony in ancient Greece:in Aristophanes'The Clouds,Socrates is described as a wise man,and Strepsiades is the incarnation of Socrates in the real sense.The relationship between the name,the incarnation and the inversion and mirror image of himself in the play reveals the similarities and differences between the thoughts of the wise man and the philosophical thoughts of Socrates;Plato's Symposium describes the discussion of Eros(ethics)among Socrates,Agathon,Argyad,and others.Socrates'restrained philosophical image reveals the glory of reason.At the same time,this dialogue is also a eulogy for Eros.As a public event in the society at that time,Socrates'defense reflected the contradictions between various forces and different classes in Athens in ancient Greece.The Defense belongs to Plato's early works,and Plato's interpretation promoted the transformation of Athens'political system,legal system and philosophical thought.

关 键 词：反讽 古希腊 古典反讽 后现代反讽 苏格拉底 

分 类 号：I0[文学—文学理论]