美学大讨论中实践美学诸概念的意义流变与理论建构  

The Changing Significance and Theoretical Construction of Aesthetic Concepts in the Great Discussion on Aesthetics

作　　者：邢研[1] Xing Yan(School of Chinese language and literature,Yunnan University)

机构地区：[1]云南大学文学院

出　　处：《美学与艺术评论》2024年第2期211-226,262,共17页Journal of Aesthetics and Art Review

摘　　要：20世纪五六十年代的第一次“美学大讨论”开启了实践美学的理论发展之路,而“自然的人化”“人本质力量对象化”“实践”等概念不仅是此时实践美学理论的核心,其在美学大讨论中的运用与演变也构成了这一时期中国马克思主义美学不断深化与发展的主要脉络。正是由于最早一批参与讨论的学者对“自然的人化”概念的自觉引入与运用尝试,才使美学大讨论在最初预设的苏联式反映论美学之外获得了新的理论资源。而随着讨论的展开,李泽厚、朱光潜、蒋孔阳等学者对这些概念的进一步阐释与运用,则使之在与苏联式反映论美学的纠缠之中,逐步成为一种突破预设不足,探索中国马克思主义美学发展基础的理论力量。The first great aesthetics debate in the 1950s and 1960s initiated the development of Marxist aesthetic theory with Chinese characteristics in the field of practical aesthetics.The concepts of“humanization of nature,”“objectification of human essential powers”,or“practice”not only take the possession of the core of practical aesthetic theory at that time,but their application and evolution in the Great Aesthetics Debate also constituted the main framework for the continuous deepening and development of Chinese Marxist aesthetics during that period.It was precisely because the earliest group of scholars participating in the discussion consciously introduced and attempted to apply the concept of humanization of nature that the great aesthetics debate has obtained new theoretical resources beyond the initially presumed aesthetics reflection theory by Soviet-style.As the great discussion of aesthetics unfolded,scholars such as Li Zehou,Zhu Guangqian,and Jiang Kongyang explained and applied the above concepts in detail.Their efforts gradually led these concepts to emerge as a theoretical force that broke away from the entanglement with Soviet-style aesthetics reflection theory.This exploration laid the foundation for the development of Chinese Marxist aesthetics.

关 键 词：美学大讨论 实践美学 自然的人化 人本质力量对象化 实践 

分 类 号：B83-0[哲学宗教—美学]