检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:蓝宛榕 邓峰[1,2] 甘霖 LAN Wan-Rong;DENG Feng;GAN Lin(College of Chemistry,South China Normal University,Guangzhou 510006,China;South China Normal University“Fundamental”Learning and Teching Research Team)
机构地区:[1]华南师范大学化学学院,广东广州510006 [2]华南师范大学“本源性”学习与教学研究团队
出 处:《化学教育(中英文)》2025年第4期62-68,共7页Chinese Journal of Chemical Education
基 金:广东省2023年一流本科课程建设项目;广东省2022年学位与研究生教育改革研究项目;广东省2022年课程思政改革示范项目;广东省2021年一流本科课程建设项目;华南师范大学中外合作混合式共享课程建设项目;华南师范大学“基于核心素养的学科测评理论与命题设计”研究项目。
摘 要:设计了《化学职前教师单元教学PCK量表式问卷》并检验其信度与效度,以测查148名化学职前教师单元教学PCK(Pedagogical Content Knowledge)的结构与水平,并进一步探究其与设计思维之间的关系。结果表明:(1)问卷具有较理想的信度与效度;(2)单元教学PCK六因子结构具有一定的合理性,各组分得分由高到低的排序为CTO、SMK、KoC、KoL、KoS、KoA;(3)单元教学PCK的六因子与设计思维之间均存在显著的正相关,且KoA、KoS对设计思维有显著正向预测作用。文末据此从PCK实证研究与化学职前教师教育课程2方面提出相应的建议。This study designed the“PCK Scale Questionnaire for Unit Teaching of Pre-Service Chemistry Teachers”and examined its reliability and validity to investigate the structure and level of PCK(Pedagogical Content Knowledge)in unit teaching among 148pre-service chemistry teachers,and further explored its relationship with design thinking.The results indicated that(1)the questionnaire had satisfactory reliability and validity;(2)the six-factor structure of PCK in unit teaching demonstrated a certain degree of rationality,with the component scores ranked from high to low as CTO,SMK,KoC,KoL,KoS,and KoA;(3)there was a significant positive correlation between the six factors of PCK in unit teaching and design thinking,and KoA and KoS had significant positive predictive effects on design thinking.Based on these findings,corresponding suggestions were proposed at the end of the paper from two aspects:empirical research on PCK and the curriculum for pre-service chemistry teacher education.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49