辩证、差异与“回反”——尼采与德勒兹之间的三重否定性  

Dialectics,Difference and“Subtraction”:The Triple Negativity between Deleuze and Nietzsche

作　　者：姜宇辉[1] JIANG Yuhui(Department of Politics and International Relations,East China Normal University,Shanghai 200241,China)

机构地区：[1]华东师范大学政治与国际关系学院,上海200241

出　　处：《同济大学学报(社会科学版)》2025年第1期10-22,共13页Journal of Tongji University:Social Science Edition

摘　　要：反思德勒兹与尼采之间的关系,否定性显然是一个关键入口。德勒兹将尼采之差异与黑格尔之否定截然对立,这个立场引申出三种否定性。第一种是强调从黑格尔到尼采的连续性发展,进而将辩证法视作尼采思想的本质。第二种是回归哲学史的脉络,进而指出德勒兹之差异其实颇为契合从柏拉图到海德格尔的否定性之思。但在黑格尔与德勒兹之间,或许也还存在着第三种否定性之可能,这尤其能够在尼采关于衰落的诸多论述之中发现线索。借助近来欧陆思想家对尼采的生物主义的丰富阐发,我们试图经由尼采回归德勒兹,进一步展现那种作为思想-生命之“回”与“反”的否定主义。Reflecting on the relationship between Deleuze and Nietzsche,negativity is clearly a key entry point.Deleuze contrasts Nietzsche’s difference with Hegel’s negation,a stance that leads to three kinds of negativity.The first is to emphasize the continuous development from Hegel to Nietzsche,and then regard dialectics as the essence of Nietzsche’s thought.The second is to return to the history of philosophy,and then point out that Deleuze’s difference is actually quite consistent with the thoughts of negativity from Plato to Heidegger.But between Hegel and Deleuze,there may be a third possibility of negativity,and clues can be found especially in Nietzsche’s many discussions on décadence.With the help of recent European thinkers’rich interpretations of Nietzsche’s biologism,we try to return to Deleuze through Nietzsche and further demonstrate the negativism as the“re-”and“counter-”of thought-life.

关 键 词：尼采 德勒兹 否定性 辩证 差异 衰落 

分 类 号：B516.47[哲学宗教—外国哲学] B565.59