湖湘学王霸观的创发与演变——以其对《孟子》“五霸假之”的诠释为中心  

The Evolution of Huxiang School's View of Wang Dao and Ba Dao:Centered on Mencius' Five Hegemons Borrow Benevolence

作　　者：陈佩辉 CHEN Peihui

机构地区：[1]山东大学易学与中国古代哲学研究中心暨哲学与社会发展学院,济南250100

出　　处：《孔子研究》2025年第1期41-50,158,共11页Confucius Studies

基　　金：国家社会科学基金青年项目“儒家政治哲学视域下的封建郡县之辨研究”(项目编号:22CZX035)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：湖湘学王霸观的核心创见是基于对《孟子》“五霸假之”的创造性解读而提出的变霸为王的思想。胡安国认为霸者久假仁即真有仁,即可变霸为王。胡寅将“久假”与《中庸》“勉强而行之”对应,为沟通王霸提供礼学支撑。胡宏虽否定霸者假仁不归即可成为王者,但肯定“假仁”构成了霸道的内核,并将霸道置于良好政治的序列,且为此提供坚实的理欲观基础。张栻则跳过胡宏,以内外感应和知行互发思想为基础论证“假仁不归即真有”,但最终被朱熹说服而放弃此说。湖湘学王霸观对当时和后世产生了重要影响。The core innovation of the view of Wang Dao and Ba Dao of Huxiang school is that it puts forward the idea of turning Ba into Wang based on the creative interpretation of the “Five Hegemons borrow benevolence” of Mencius. Hu Anguo thought that the hegemon who has borrowed benevolence long and not returned would really has benevolence, thus can become a Wangzhe(King). Hu Yin corresponded “long borrow” to “and some by strenuous effort” of Zhongyong to provide more classic resources to bridge Wang and Ba. Although Hu Hong denied that the hegemon can become a king by means of keeping borrow benevolence, he thought the hegemon's “borrow ren” is the core of Ba Dao, thus put Ba Dao in the sequence of good politics, and his view of rational and desire provided a solid foundation for this. Zhang Shi skipped Hu Hong and argued that the hegemon borrowed benevolence long and not returned would really has benevolence based on the idea of internal and external induction and mutual stimulation of knowledge and action, but was finally persuaded by Zhu Xi to abandon this theory. The view of Wang Dao and Ba Dao of Huxiang school had an important impact on that time and later generations.

关 键 词：湖湘学 王霸观 假仁 变霸为王 

分 类 号：B244.99[哲学宗教—中国哲学]