程序性事实观下刑事证据制度改革路径探究  

Research on the Reform Path of Criminal Evidence System under the Concept of Procedural Fact

作　　者：杨波[1] YANG Bo(Law School,Jilin University,Changchun Jilin 130012,China)

机构地区：[1]吉林大学法学院,吉林长春130012

出　　处：《法学论坛》2025年第1期27-38,共12页Legal Forum

基　　金：国家社科基金重点项目“刑事诉讼事实形成机制研究”(21AFX014)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：程序性事实观是证据法与程序法关系的高度凝结,是一种理性的事实观,其能够打破结果性事实观的局限与束缚,为刑事证据制度的构建提供直接、有效的理论支撑。程序性事实观下,刑事证据制度的体系化重塑应首先明确“准确认定案件事实”的立法目的,进而以事实认定的准确性为核心,全面构建逻辑严谨、层次分明的证据规则体系以及理性科学的刑事诉讼证明制度。程序性事实观要求完善刑事诉讼程序,为事实证明活动的充分展开提供理想的程序空间。The procedural fact concept is a high condensation of relationship between the evidence law and the procedural law. It is a rational fact concept. It can break the limitation and constraint of the consequential fact concept and provide direct and effective theoretical support for the construction of the criminal evidence system. Under the concept of procedural fact, the systematic reconstruction of the criminal evidence system should first clarify the legislative purpose of " accurate cognizance of case facts", and then take the accuracy of fact cognizance as the core to comprehensively construct a logical and hierarchical evidence rule system and a rational and scientific criminal procedure proof system. The procedural fact concept requires the improvement of criminal procedure and provides an ideal procedural space for the full development of factual proof activities.

关 键 词：程序性事实观 事实 证据规则 证明制度 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]