时间与存在:海德格尔对存在意义的追问  

Time and Being:Heidegger’s Tracing after the Meaning of Being

作　　者： 周小龙(译) 潘易植(校) Johannes Brachtendorf;Zhou Xiaolong;Pan Yizhi

机构地区：[1]德国图宾根大学神学院、哲学学院 [2]中山大学哲学系,广州510275 [3]德国图宾根大学哲学学院

出　　处：《中山大学学报(社会科学版)》2025年第2期1-11,共11页Journal of Sun Yat-sen University(Social Science Edition)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金后期资助项目“费希特与浪漫派的存在问题研究”(22FZXB012);第72批博士后面上项目“施莱尔马赫辩证法思想研究”(2022M723681);第17批博士后站中特别资助项目“主体与实体:早期浪漫派与费希特知识学的对话”(2024T171089)。

摘　　要：《存在与时间》这部未完成的作品追问了存在的意义,其写作的中断是海德格尔思想中的重要事件。对此,1927年的讲座课《现象学之基本问题》提供了理解这一事件的观察视角。该讲座课对《存在与时间》基本思路的延续,表明海德格尔之所以中断《存在与时间》的写作,是因为他前期的基础存在论仍然是先验的、主体哲学的思维,陷入“对主体性的巩固”的危险,而讲座课并未从根本上转变这一思维方式。“转向”后的海德格尔从根本上放弃了主体哲学,转向“本有之思”,希望通过跃入存在本身的本质,来寻求存在的意义。The unfinished work Being and Time traces the meaning of Being,and its interruption is an important event in Heidegger’s thought.In this regard,the 1927 lecture course The Basic Problems of Phenomenology offers valuable insights for understanding this event.The lecture course’s continuation of the basic ideas of Being and Time shows that Heidegger’s interruption of Being and Time was driven by the realization that his earlier Fundamental Ontology was still a transcendental,subjective-philosophical mindset that was in danger of falling into the“consolidation of subjectivity”,and that the lecture course did not change this way of thinking.After the“turn”,Heidegger completely abandoned the philosophy of subjectivity and turned to“Ereignisdenken”,hoping to seek the meaning of Being by leaping into the essence of Being itself.

关 键 词：讲座课(1927) 基础存在论 主体哲学 转向 本有之思 

分 类 号：B51[哲学宗教—外国哲学]