检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:何新敬 HE Xinjing(School of Economics and Management,Southwest University of Science and Technology,Mianyang 621010,Sichuan,China)
机构地区:[1]西南科技大学经济管理学院,四川绵阳621010
出 处:《科技和产业》2025年第6期320-325,共6页Science Technology and Industry
基 金:西南科技大学研究生创新基金(24ycx1045)。
摘 要:分析政府不同碳配额分配方式对独立再制造的影响,基于历史排放法和基准法建立原始设备制造商和独立再制造商之间的博弈模型,比较两种不同的碳配额分配方式对闭环供应链成员的最优生产决策、利润及环境的影响。结果表明,历史排放法下新产品销量较低,再制造产品销量较高,更有利于环境保护,同时促进再制造产业发展。当总量碳配额和基准碳配额满足特定条件时,原始设备制造商和独立再制造商在历史排放法下可以实现利润双赢。In order to analyze the impacts of differentcarbon allowance allocation rules of the government on independent remanufacturing,a game model between an original equipment manufacturer and an independent remanufacturer was established based on the grandfathering rule and the benchmarking rule.The impacts of the two different carbon allowance allocation rules on the optimal production decisions,profits,and the environment of the members of the closed-loop supply chain were compared.The results show that the lower sales of new products and the higher sales of remanufactured products under the grandfathering rule are more friendly to environmental protection while promoting the development of the remanufacturing industry.The original equipment manufacturer and the independent remanufacturer can realize a win-win profit in the grandfathering rule when the total carbon quota and baseline carbon quota meet specific requirements.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49