检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:尤雪宁 YOU Xue-ning
机构地区:[1]上海外国语大学贤达经济人文学院马克思主义学院
出 处:《河北法律职业教育》2025年第3期49-54,共6页HEBEI VOCATIONAL EDUCATION OF LAW
基 金:2024年度上海外国语大学贤达经济人文学院党的创新理论研究中心(所)课题“新时代法治政府建设研究”(CXLL2412);获上海高校马院攻坚提质计划支持。
摘 要:关于过程性行政行为的可诉性问题我国法律上并没有明确的规定,然而随着行政管理活动的丰富,行政行为的表现形式也愈加多样,越来越多的过程性行政行为涌入到行政诉讼领域的视野中,学术上也因此对于过程性行政行为的可诉标准进行了研究和归纳,但仍未根本解决司法实践中对于过程性行政行为的可诉性如何进行司法审查的难题。对此,从司法审查的角度对过程性行政行为的可诉性进行研究,提出形式审查与实质审查相结合的路径,以期突破当前困境。The issue of the justiciability of procedural administrative acts is not explicitly regulated in Chinese law.However,with the increasing complexity of administrative activities,the forms of administrative acts have be-come more diverse.Consequently,a growing number of procedural administrative acts have entered the realm of ad-ministrative litigation.While academia has studied and summarized the standards for the justiciability of procedural administrative acts,the fundamental challenge of how to conduct judicial review of their justiciability in judicial practice remains unresolved.In this regard,this paper examines the justiciability of procedural administrative acts from the perspective of judicial review and proposes a combined approach of formal review and substantive review,aiming to break through the current predicament.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.159