论鲁迅与马克思在悲剧观念上的潜在对话  

The Research on the latent Dialogue between Lu Xun and Marx on the Concept of Tragedy

作　　者：史晓林[1,2] Xiaolin SHI(Henan University)

机构地区：[1]河南大学文学院 [2]河南大学省级重点研究基地文艺学研究中心

出　　处：《马克思主义美学研究》2024年第2期153-167,400,共16页Research on Marxist Aesthetics

基　　金：中国文学艺术基金会、中国文学艺术发展专项基金资助;国家社科基金重大项目“马克思主义中国化视域下的‘左联’文论及其资料整理研究”(22&ZD281);浙江省哲学社会科学规划优势特色学科重大项目“马克思主义美学史的理论研究”(22YSXK01ZD)阶段性成果

摘　　要：在悲剧观念上,鲁迅与马克思都未将悲剧拘囿在纯粹的艺术领域,而是注重悲剧的社会批判力,追求一种作为批判形态的现代悲剧。二者在悲剧的批判方式、批判的实质和批判的目的上均存在潜在对话。批判方式上,鲁迅追求的“肉薄”契合了马克思主张“搏斗式的批判”;批判的实质上,二者都是对“价值”的重新评判;批判目的上,二者均非为了批判而批判,而是都指向了革命与建设。二者在悲剧观念上的对话反映了马克思对鲁迅的影响。作为中国文艺现代化早期马克思主义思想中国化的文艺实践,鲁迅现代悲剧观念的研究有助于更好地探索中国当代马克思主义文艺理论的中国化。In terms of the concept of tragedy,both Lu Xun and Marx did not confine tragedy to the purely artistic realm,but focused on the social critical power of tragedy and pursued a modern tragedy as a form of criticism.There is a potential dialogue between the two in terms of the critical approach,essence,and purpose of tragedy criticism.In terms of critical ap⁃proach,Lu Xun's pursuit of“melee”aligns with Marx's advocacy of“struggle⁃style criti⁃cism”;In essence,both are a re⁃evaluation of“value”;In terms of the purpose of criticism,both are not criticizing for the sake of criticism,but are directed towards revolution and con⁃struction.The dialogue between the two in the concept of tragedy reflects Marx's influence on Lu Xun.As a literary practice of sinicizing Marxist thought in the early modernization of Chi⁃nese literature and art,the study of Lu Xun's modern tragedy concept helps to better explore the sinicization of contemporary Chinese Marxist literary theory.

关 键 词：鲁迅 马克思 悲剧 批判形态 

分 类 号：I0[文学—文学理论]