牟宗三“审美力”与康德“审美判断力”的异同比较  

Comparison of the Differences and Similarities between Mou Chung-san’s“Aesthetic Power”and Kant’s“Aesthetic Judgment”

作　　者：余群[1] Yu Qun

机构地区：[1]浙江越秀外国语学院中国语言文化学院

出　　处：《中国美学研究》2024年第2期271-283,共13页

基　　金：国家社科基金后期资助项目“牟宗三儒学美学思想研究”(23FZWB063);国家社科基金项目“王阳明心学美学思想研究”(19BZW032);浙江省社会科学重点研究基地项目“刘宗周理学美学思想研究”(16JDGH053)的阶段性成果之一

摘　　要：牟宗三提出“审美力”范畴,目的是要取代康德的“审美判断力”这个范畴。牟宗三此举是为了借鉴并超越康德,因此,这两个范畴之间存在着明显的异同。其相同点是:都重视“真善美”之和谐;都始于道德,归于道德;都是无向判断,并且特别注重内在的体验。其不同点是:康德二律背反与牟宗三“上下其讲”之不同;普遍性与非普遍性之不同;识心与天心之不同。Mou Chung-san proposed the category of“aesthetic power”with the aim of replacing Kant’s category of“aesthetic judgment”.Mou Chungsan’s action was to draw inspiration from Kant and surpass him,therefore,there are obvious similarities and differences between these two categories.Their commonality is that they both value the harmony of“truth,goodness,and beauty”;Both begin with morality and return to morality;they are both of undirected judgments and pay special attention to inner experiences.The difference lies in the contradiction between Kant’s two laws and Mou Chung-san’s“upper and lower teachings”;the difference between universality and non universality;the difference between the conscious mind and the heavenly mind.

关 键 词：牟宗三 “审美力” 康德 “审美判断力” 比较 

分 类 号：I01[文学—文学理论] B83-0[哲学宗教—美学]