科学的道德价值  

The Moral Value of Science

作　　者：古斯塔夫·贝洛 周星哲(译) Gustave Belot

机构地区：[1]路易大帝高中 [2]北京师范大学价值与文化研究中心、哲学学院、社会主义核心价值观协同创新中心

出　　处：《当代中国价值观研究》2025年第1期94-108,共15页Chinese Journal of Contemporary Values

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目“法国尼科科学哲学著作翻译与研究”(23BZX099)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：科学与道德代表两种最高价值,二者如何衡量与协调,构成具有张力性的问题。道德和谐主义方案所预设的科学与道德之间的和谐既非先验地不言自明,亦非经验地得到证实。事实上,真理意志超越社会意志,科学精神独立于社会权威。科学与道德之间存有冲突之处,表现在科学精神中的无政府主义、个人主义和普遍主义。与此同时,科学与道德之间又存有一致之处,表现在科学精神中的超然态度、理智真诚和自主精神。故此,科学与道德之间冲突的解决方案不应该是革命式的,而应该是逐步逼近式的。逐步逼近式解决方案包括区分思想领域和行动领域的分离方案以及促使道德趋近于科学的动态融合方案。科学的道德价值由此得到最高确认。Science and morality represent two supreme values that must be measured and harmonized,posing a tension that requires nuanced consideration.The harmony between science and morality,presupposed by the moral Concordism,is neither a priori self-evident nor empirically verified.In fact,the will to truth transcends social will,and scientific spirit stands aloof from social authority.Conflicts exist between science and morality,manifested in anarchism,individualism,and universalism,which are present in scientific spirit.Meanwhile,there exists consistency between science and morality,revealed by disinterestedness,intellectual sincerity,and autonomous spirit,which are present in scientific spirit.Therefore,the solution to the conflict between science and morality should not be revolutionary but gradual,involving a separation scheme that distinguishes between thought domains and action domains,as well as a dynamic integration scheme that brings morality closer to science.The moral value of science is thus confirmed at its highest level.

关 键 词：科学精神 道德价值 真理意志 社会意志 

分 类 号：B82-057[哲学宗教—伦理学]