以孔子为切入点:重释王炳照先生教育史学思想的现代价值——兼谈中国教育史领域的批判与继承问题  

Reinterpreting the Modern Value of Wang Bingzhao’s Educational History Thought with Confucius as Breakthrough Point:Also on Criticism and Inheritance in the Field of Educational History in China

作　　者：孙杰[1] Sun Jie

机构地区：[1]山西大学教育科学学院,太原030006

出　　处：《教育史研究》2025年第1期24-34,共11页Educational History Studies

摘　　要：以《论“学而优则仕”》一文的发表为标志,在王炳照先生提出如何重新评价孔子的新主张之时,恰好是教育史领域以重新评价孔子教育思想为突破口,来恢复教育史学科在培养人才和教育科学中的基础性地位的历史起点。先生从探讨中国传统教育和现代化关系的角度出发,提出了继承和发扬教育遗产的新方法——“二重性·两点论·双重任务”,从学理层面回答了教育史领域如何开展批判与继承的基本问题,为教育史学科开展基本理论问题研究提供了方向指引和路径遵循。陈元晖先生倡导中国教育学史研究,是为了构建具有中国特色、中国风格、中国气派的教育学,而教育史领域探讨继承和发扬中国传统教育遗产的学术价值就在于此。让中国教育学史化身为将教育学托上天空的一朵彩云,正是从陈元晖先生到王炳照先生一以贯之的学术愿望!Marked by the publication of the article On“Good Scholar Should Seek for Official Career”,Wang Bingzhao puts forward a new idea to re-evaluate Confucius,which is just the breakthrough point for the field of educational history to re-evaluate Confucius’educational thought and the historical start to restore the basic position of educational history discipline in cultivating talents and educational science.Through discussing the relationship between traditional education and modernization in China,he puts forward a new method of inheriting and carrying forward educational heritage which is duality,two points and double tasks,and answers the basic questions of how to carry out criticism and inheritance in the field of educational history from the academic level,providing direction and path for the discipline of educational history to carry out basic theoretical issue research.Chen Yuanhui advocates educational history research in China in order to construct pedagogy with Chinese characteristics,style and manner which is the academic value of inheriting and carrying forward China’s traditional educational heritage in this field.

关 键 词：王炳照 教育史学思想 二重性·两点论·双重任务 中国教育学史 

分 类 号：G529[文化科学—教育学]