民国时期教育学科设置的三次论争及其当代启示  

Three Debates and Contemporary Enlightenment of the Establishment of the Discipline of Education in the Republic of China

作　　者：杨伟东 栗洪武[2] Yang Weidong;Li Hongwu

机构地区：[1]延安大学教育科学学院,延安716000 [2]陕西师范大学教育科学学院,西安710061

出　　处：《教育史研究》2025年第1期55-64,共10页Educational History Studies

基　　金：中国高等教育学会2024年度高等教育科学研究规划课题“延安时期延安大学红色教育家群里与红色教育家精神研究”(24XS0406);国家社会科学基金“十四五”规划2022年度教育学一般课题“中国新民主主义教育发展史研究”(BOA20189)。

摘　　要：民国时期,教育学科经历了从无到有、从附设于师范学校到附设于普通大学、从单轨发展到“双轨”并进的演变过程。在这一过程中,围绕着教育学科的设置问题,出现了三次较大的论争。尽管不同时期的论争有不同的时代背景,但论争的焦点问题则相对一致,即教育学科应该归属于师范学校还是普通大学。经过激烈论争,最终形成了教育学科在师范学校和普通大学共存并进的“双轨”发展格局。回顾这些论争,有助于厘清教育学科的发展史,展现教育学术与教育制度变迁的历史互动,也能为新时代教育学科的改革和发展提供一定的参考。In the Republic of China,the discipline of education underwent the transformation from scratch to emergence,from being attached to normal schools to ordinary universities,and from single track development to dual track progress.During this process,there were three major debates surrounding the establishment of the discipline.Although the debates in different periods had different historical backgrounds,their focus was relatively consistent,that is,whether the discipline of education should belong to normal schools or ordinary universities.After intense debate,a dual track development pattern that the discipline coexisted in both normal schools and ordinary universities was ultimately formed.Reviewing these debates helps to clarify the development history of the discipline,demonstrate the historical interaction between educational academia and educational system change,and provide certain reference for the reform and development of the discipline in the new era.

关 键 词：民国时期 教育学科 师范教育 学术论争 

分 类 号：G40-09[文化科学—教育学原理]