检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴绒[1] 陈佳琪 陈彦岐 WU Rong;CHEN Jiaqi;CHEN Yanqi
机构地区:[1]哈尔滨商业大学管理学院
出 处:《价格理论与实践》2024年第6期114-120,共7页Price:Theory & Practice
基 金:黑龙江省哲学社会科学研究规划项目“智慧供应链视角下助农直播驱动黑龙江生态产品价值实现路径研究”(项目编号:24JYB012)
摘 要:政府碳税政策的合理实施,将有利于降低企业碳排放、推动绿色低碳发展。本文考虑碳减排企业面临资金约束和消费者的环保呼声,分别构建“低碳补贴+碳税”和“绿色信贷+碳税”两种绿色减排组合政策情境下,政府和碳减排企业的Stackelberg博弈模型,研究企业低碳产品定价和生产决策。模拟结果表明:(1)碳税正向影响绿色信贷下的低碳产品定价,对补贴下低碳产品的定价不产生影响;(2)消费者环保意识和碳减排率的提高有利于促进碳减排企业提高低碳产品生产量,增加企业利润和政府社会福利;(3)低碳产品补贴和碳税组合政策下企业低碳产品产量更高,而绿色信贷和碳税组合政策下的企业低碳产品定价更高,且在相同碳减排率下,低碳产品补贴和碳税组合政策下的企业利润和社会福利更高;(4)低碳产品补贴和碳税组合政策更能增加碳减排企业的绿色减排动机,绿色信贷和碳税组合政策更能缓解碳减排企业融资压力,减少政府支出。基于此,政府应进一步完善低碳产品财税支持和碳税制度;企业应探索多元化绿色转型路径,共同培养低碳消费方式,实现社会、经济和生态三重效益。Government support and the rational implementation of carbon tax policies are conducive to reducing corporate carbon emissions and promoting green and low-carbon development.This paper considers the realistic scenario where carbon reduction enterprises face financial constraints and consumers exhibit environmental awareness.It constructs Stackelberg game models for both the government and carbon reduction enterprises under the combined policies of low-carbon product subsidies,green credit,and carbon tax.The study examines government subsidy decisions,low-carbon product pricing,and production decisions,and compares the two green emission reduction policy combinations.The results indicate that:(1)Carbon tax positively affects low-carbon product pricing under green credit but has no impact on pricing under subsidies;(2)Increasing consumer environmental awareness and carbon reduction rates significantly stimulate carbon reduction enterprises to boost production,enhancing both corporate profits and government social welfare;(3)The combination of low-carbon product subsidies and carbon tax results in higher production levels,while the combination of green credit and carbon tax leads to higher pricing.Moreover,under the same carbon reduction rate,the combination of low-carbon product subsidies and carbon tax yields higher corporate profits and social welfare;(4)The combination of low-carbon product subsidies and carbon tax better motivates carbon reduction enterprises to pursue green emission reduction,while the combination of green credit and carbon tax better alleviates financing pressures on carbon reduction enterprises and reduces government expenditures.Based on these findings,the government should design subsidy and carbon tax systems rationally,and enterprises should explore diversified green transformation paths.Together,they should foster low-carbon and environmentally friendly consumption patterns to achieve social,economic,and ecological benefits.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49