文学批评的史料问题  

The Problem of Historical Material in Literary Criticism

作　　者：黄发有[1] Huang Fayou

机构地区：[1]山东大学文学院,济南250100

出　　处：《中国文学批评》2025年第2期109-115,M0006,共8页Chinese Journal of Literary Criticism

摘　　要：史料是文学批评与文学研究的基石,批评家应当具有史料意识。史料意识不应该停留于观念化的史料知识与史料思维,还应该体现在史料辨析与史料运用的实践之中,并在学术实践的检验中不断修正、丰富与深化。在文学批评场域中,编辑与读者的批评通常被忽略。从史料角度来看,编辑与读者的批评意见有特殊的价值。关注并倡导编辑与读者的批评,不仅有利于拓展文学批评的场域,还能扩充文学批评的史料库,强化文学批评实践与文学批评史研究的过程性、动态性与开放性,突破以少数文学精英为中心的滞后的、静态的、封闭的文学评价机制。Historical material is the cornerstone of literary criticism and literary research,and critics should be aware of that.Awareness of historical materials should not remain in the conceptualized knowledge and thinking of historical materials,but should also be reflected in the practice of analysis and application of historical materials,and constantly revised,enriched and deepened in the test of academic practice.In the field of literary criticism,the criticism of editors and readers is usually neglected,which however,have special value in terms of historical materials.Paying attention to and advocating the criticism of editors and readers is not only conducive to expanding the field of literary criticism,but also expanding its historical database,strengthening the process,dynamics and openness of the practice of literary criticism and the study of the history of literary criticism,so as to break through the lagging,static and closed literary evaluation mechanism centred on the minority of literary elites.

关 键 词：文学批评 历史视野 史料意识 批评场域 

分 类 号：I06[文学—文学理论]